Assessing Carolina Bay Wetland Restoration Risks to Downstream Water Quality by Characterizing Land Use and Stream Proximity

被引:0
|
作者
Dana G. Sullivan
Jeffrey G. White
Michael Vepraskas
机构
[1] TurfScout LLC,Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
[2] North Carolina State University,undefined
来源
Wetlands | 2019年 / 39卷
关键词
Carolina Bay; Wetland; Restoration; Water quality; Phosphorus; Risk assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Carolina Bay wetlands are distinct common components of the Southeastern US Coastal Plain. Many have a history of drainage for agriculture. Restoration of prior-drained Bays can increase P solubility and transport, with potential adverse impacts downstream. To assess risk of off-site P transport, we documented Bay land use, drained area, and proximity to streams and drainageways. We studied Bladen County, NC, where an exhaustive Bay inventory is available. Land-use was documented via classified Landsat decadal images from 1972 through 2010. We compared sequential image pairs to document land-use changes. Phosphorus risk to downstream waters was assessed based on stream proximity, agricultural land use, and arable area. At least 80% of Bays constituting 97% of total Bay area (51,704 ha) exhibited evidence of land-use change. Edges of Bays comprising 80% of Bay coverage were within 15 m of a stream; Bays comprising 13% were isolated. Twenty-one percent of Bay area remained drained in 2010. Prior, 28% of Bay area posed moderate to severe threats to downstream waters; as of 2010, 9%. Considering long-term effects of restoration-induced off-site transport of agrochemicals, land-use history, drained area, and stream/drainageaway proximity should be considered in choosing Bays for restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 506
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing Carolina Bay Wetland Restoration Risks to Downstream Water Quality by Characterizing Land Use and Stream Proximity
    Sullivan, Dana G.
    White, Jeffrey G.
    Vepraskas, Michael
    WETLANDS, 2019, 39 (03) : 495 - 506
  • [2] Effects of agriculture and wetland restoration on hydrology, soils, and water quality of a Carolina bay complex
    Bruland, Gregory L.
    Hanchey, Matthew F.
    Richardson, Curtis J.
    WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 11 (03) : 141 - 156
  • [3] Effects of agriculture and wetland restoration on hydrology, soils, and water quality of a Carolina bay complex
    Gregory L. Bruland
    Matthew F. Hanchey
    Curtis J. Richardson
    Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2003, 11 : 141 - 156
  • [4] Land-use proximity as a basis for assessing stream water quality in New York State (USA)
    Tran, Christopher P.
    Bode, Robert W.
    Smith, Alexander J.
    Kleppel, Gary S.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2010, 10 (03) : 727 - 733
  • [5] EFFECTS OF LIVESTOCK EXCLUSION AND STREAM RESTORATION ON THE WATER QUALITY OF A NORTH CAROLINA STREAM
    Line, D. E.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2015, 58 (06) : 1547 - 1557
  • [6] Assessing land use change impact on stream discharge and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed
    Ni, Xiaojing
    Parajuli, Prem B.
    Ouyang, Ying
    Dash, Padmanava
    Siegert, Courtney
    CATENA, 2021, 198
  • [7] Assessing the impacts of land use on downstream water quality using a hydrologically sensitive area concept
    Giri, Subhasis
    Qiu, Zeyuan
    Zhang, Zhen
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 213 : 309 - 319
  • [8] Integrated stream and wetland restoration: A watershed approach to improved water quality on the landscape
    Richardson, Curtis J.
    Flanagan, Neal E.
    Ho, Mengchi
    Pahl, James W.
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 37 (01) : 25 - 39
  • [9] The impact of land use on stream water quality in Slovakia
    Pekarova, P
    Pekar, J
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1996, 180 (1-4) : 333 - 350
  • [10] Land Use Planning and Social Equity in North Carolina's Compensatory Wetland and Stream Mitigation Programs
    BenDor, Todd
    Stewart, Audrey
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 47 (02) : 239 - 253