The shadow of the future promotes cooperation in a repeated prisoner’s dilemma for children

被引:0
|
作者
Peter R. Blake
David G. Rand
Dustin Tingley
Felix Warneken
机构
[1] Boston University,Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
[2] Yale University,Department of Psychology, Department of Economics
[3] School of Management,Department of Government
[4] Harvard University,Department of Psychology
[5] Harvard University,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cooperation among genetically unrelated individuals can be supported by direct reciprocity. Theoretical models and experiments with adults show that the possibility of future interactions with the same partner can promote cooperation via conditionally cooperative strategies such as tit-for-tat (TFT). Here, we introduce a novel implementation of the repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) designed for children to examine whether repeated interactions can successfully promote cooperation in 10 and 11 year olds. We find that children cooperate substantially more in repeated PDs than in one-shot PDs. We also find that girls cooperate more than boys and that children with more conduct problems cooperate less. Finally, we find that children use conditional cooperation strategies but that these strategies vary by gender and conduct problem rating. Specifically, girls and children with few conduct problems appear to follow an altruistic version of win-stay, lose-shift (WSLS), attempting to re-establish cooperation after they had defected. Boys and children with more conduct problems appear to follow a Grim strategy, defecting for the duration after the partner defects. Thus we provide evidence that children utilize the power of direct reciprocity to promote cooperation in strategic interactions and that, by late elementary school, distinct strategies of conditional cooperation have emerged.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The shadow of the future promotes cooperation in a repeated prisoner's dilemma for children
    Blake, Peter R.
    Rand, David G.
    Tingley, Dustin
    Warneken, Felix
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [2] Repeated thinking promotes cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma game
    Zhang, Jun
    Cai, Kai-Quan
    Du, Wen-Bo
    Cao, Xian-Bin
    [J]. PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2012, 85 (05)
  • [3] COOPERATION IN THE FINITELY REPEATED PRISONER'S DILEMMA
    Embrey, Matthew
    Frechette, Guillaume R.
    Yuksel, Sevgi
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2018, 133 (01): : 509 - 551
  • [4] Predation promotes cooperation in Prisoner's dilemma games
    Yang, Xiqing
    Zhang, Feng
    Wang, Wanxiong
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 514 : 20 - 24
  • [5] Autonomy promotes the evolution of cooperation in prisoner's dilemma
    Li, Liang
    Chen, Chen
    Li, Aming
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2020, 102 (04)
  • [6] Motives behind cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma
    Chakraborty, Anujit
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2023, 141 : 105 - 132
  • [7] Personality and cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma games
    Kagel, John
    McGee, Peter
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2014, 124 (02) : 274 - 277
  • [8] Cooperation, but No Reciprocity: Individual Strategies in the Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma
    Breitmoser, Yves
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (09): : 2882 - 2910
  • [9] Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game
    John M. McNamara
    Zoltan Barta
    Alasdair I. Houston
    [J]. Nature, 2004, 428 : 745 - 748
  • [10] Chaos promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game
    Perc, M.
    [J]. EUROPHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 75 (06): : 841 - 846