After a Disaster: Lessons in Survey Methodology from Hurricane Katrina

被引:0
|
作者
Tammy L. Henderson
Maria Sirois
Angela Chia-Chen Chen
Christopher Airriess
David A. Swanson
David Banks
机构
[1] Oklahoma State University,Human Development and Family Science
[2] Tulane University,Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
[3] Arizona State University,College of Nursing and Healthcare Innovation
[4] Ball State University,Department of Geography
[5] University of California Riverside,Department of Sociology
[6] Duke University,Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences
来源
关键词
Disaster research; Short-form enumeration; Long-form sample survey; Stratified random sampling; Convenience sampling; Purposive sampling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In 2005, the National Science Foundation funded a number of projects to study the impact of Hurricane Katrina. The current article provides an overview of several research approaches used to conduct post-Katrina research. Each method had some advantages and disadvantages. The post-disaster context meant that experience from traditional survey methods often did not apply. Comparisons of advantages and disadvantages associated with each sampling method serve to inform future post-disaster research and illuminate the limits of classical research methods.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 92
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条