Do women change their breast cancer mammogram screening behaviour after BRCA1/2 testing?

被引:0
|
作者
Geneviève Larouche
Jocelyne Chiquette
Sylvie Pelletier
Jacques Simard
Michel Dorval
机构
[1] Université Laval,Faculté de Pharmacie
[2] Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec – Université Laval,Centre des Maladies du sein Deschênes
[3] Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer de l’Université Laval,Fabia
[4] CHU de Québec – Université Laval,Faculté de Médecine
[5] Université Laval,Chaire de Recherche du Canada en Oncogénétique
[6] Université Laval,undefined
来源
Familial Cancer | 2017年 / 16卷
关键词
Genes BRCA 1; Genes BRCA 2; Mammography; Breast cancer genetic testing; Breast cancer screening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Little is known about the change in mammograms use by women after BRCA1/2 genetic testing. We compared the rate of bilateral mammograms after and prior to BRCA1/2 testing, according to test result. Information from the Quebec Health Insurance Board database was used to identify all registered mammograms delivered between May 1, 1998 and March 31, 2012 to a cohort of 396 unaffected French Canadian women tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. Mammograms incidence density ratios were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model for repeated events. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women with an inconclusive result had more mammograms after, than prior to, genetic testing. Non-carriers did not receive more mammograms. The observed increase in mammography screening in BRCA1/2 carriers is consistent with the high risk of developing breast cancer in this group. The estimation of the cancer risk associated with an inconclusive result is based on familial cancer history, and women who received this result appear to have received follow-up as if at high risk. The fact that non-carriers did not change their use of mammograms after genetic testing may possibly reflect a ‘defensive medicine’ approach by some physicians or the women’s preference.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do women change their breast cancer mammogram screening behaviour after BRCA1/2 testing?
    Larouche, Genevieve
    Chiquette, Jocelyne
    Pelletier, Sylvie
    Simard, Jacques
    Dorval, Michel
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2017, 16 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [2] Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing
    Peshkin, BN
    Schwartz, MD
    Isaacs, C
    Hughes, C
    Main, D
    Lerman, C
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2002, 11 (10) : 1115 - 1118
  • [3] BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Young Women With Breast Cancer
    Rosenberg, Shoshana M.
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Gelber, Shari
    Schapira, Lidia
    Come, Steven
    Borges, Virginia F.
    Larsen, Bryce
    Garber, Judy E.
    Partridge, Ann H.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (06) : 730 - 736
  • [4] Breast cancer in young women: do BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations matter?
    Fasching, Peter A.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (02): : 150 - 151
  • [5] Breast cancer screening by women from BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutation positive families
    Wuttke, Melanie
    Milne, Roger
    Weideman, Prue
    Picken, Sandra
    Smith, Charmaine
    Friedlander, Michael
    McLachlan, Sue-Anne
    Hopper, John L.
    Phillips, Kelly-Anne
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [6] Measuring women's preferences for breast cancer treatments and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing
    Cappelli, M
    Surh, L
    Humphreys, L
    Verma, S
    Logan, D
    Hunter, A
    Allanson, J
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (07) : 595 - 607
  • [7] Measuring women's preferences for breast cancer treatments and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing
    M. Cappelli
    L. Surh
    L. Humphreys
    S. Verma
    D. Logan
    A. Hunter
    J. Allanson
    Quality of Life Research, 2001, 10 : 595 - 607
  • [8] The effectiveness of breast cancer screening with MRI and mammography in women with a BRCA1/2 mutation
    de Bock, G.
    Hassankhan, F. S.
    Oosterwijk, J. C.
    Mourits, M. J.
    Jansen, L.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (03): : 240 - 240
  • [10] Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing for breast cancer survivors
    Wiggins, Jennifer
    McLoughlin, Anne
    George, Angela
    Ring, Alistair
    Kemp, Zoe
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2020, 57 (08) : 528 - 530