Protection for sale: evidence from around the world

被引:0
|
作者
Andrew Jonelis
Wisarut Suwanprasert
机构
[1] Syracuse University,Department of Economics, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs
[2] Middle Tennessee State University,Department of Economics and Finance, Jennings A. Jones College of Business
来源
Public Choice | 2022年 / 191卷
关键词
Import tariffs; Endogenous trade protection; Lobbying; Protection for sale; Party strength; F13; D71; P16;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The “protection-for-sale” motive introduced by Grossman and Helpman (Am Econ Rev 84: 833–850, 1994) has been adopted widely in the literature, but only a few papers test the theory empirically. To provide empirical evidence for the protection-for-sale theory, we proceed in three steps. First, we argue that among all existing theories, only the mechanism in the protection-for-sale theory depends on the government’s political strength. Second, we develop a theoretical model to rationalize the connection between political strength and import tariffs. Our extended protection-for-sale model predicts that a government with greater political power generally imposes higher tariffs. Third, we propose that political strength can be proxied by the share of legislative seats held by the governing party or coalition. We test the model prediction using panel data covering 95 product categories and 105 countries, from 1996 to 2014. Our estimates provide support the protection-for-sale theory. The estimated effects of political strength on tariffs are larger in small and democratic countries.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 267
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protection for sale: evidence from around the world
    Jonelis, Andrew
    Suwanprasert, Wisarut
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2022, 191 (1-2) : 237 - 267
  • [2] Investor Protection and Capital Fragility: Evidence from Hedge Funds around the World
    Aragon, George O.
    Nanda, Vikram
    Zhao, Haibei
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 34 (03): : 1368 - 1407
  • [3] Investor protection and corporate cash holdings around the world: New evidence
    Iskandar-Datta M.E.
    Jia Y.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2014, 43 (2) : 245 - 273
  • [4] Protection for sale and political regimes: Empirical evidence
    D. Mitra
    D. Thomakos
    M. Ulubasoglu
    [J]. International Advances in Economic Research, 2001, 7 (2) : 270 - 270
  • [5] Public perceptions of marine threats and protection from around the world
    Lotze, Heike K.
    Guest, Haley
    O'Leary, Jennifer
    Tuda, Arthur
    Wallace, Douglas
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 152 : 14 - 22
  • [6] Immigrant Health Around the World: Evidence from the World Values Survey
    Noymer, Andrew
    Lee, Rennie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2013, 15 (03) : 614 - 623
  • [7] Immigrant Health Around the World: Evidence from the World Values Survey
    Andrew Noymer
    Rennie Lee
    [J]. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2013, 15 : 614 - 623
  • [8] Returns to skills around the world: Evidence from PIAAC
    Hanushek, Eric A.
    Schwerdt, Guido
    Wiederhold, Simon
    Woessmann, Ludger
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 73 : 103 - 130
  • [9] Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world
    Fan, C. Simon
    Lin, Chen
    Treisman, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2009, 93 (1-2) : 14 - 34
  • [10] Corruption and Firm Growth: Evidence from around the World
    Fisman, Raymond
    Guriev, Sergei
    Ioramashvili, Carolin
    Plekhanov, Alexander
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 134 (660): : 1494 - 1516