Evaluation of Laser Shock Processing Quality of a Superalloy Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology

被引:0
|
作者
Hebin Wu
Jingling Zeng
Qi Zhang
Chaohui Lin
Fuxiang Liu
Xiaojun Guo
Yuanqing Chi
Yongkang Zhang
Xiaolei Chen
机构
[1] Guangdong University of Technology,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacturing Technology of Marine Energy Equipment
[2] Guangdong University of Technology,School of Electromechanical Engineering
[3] AECC Hunan Aviation Powerplant Research Institute,undefined
关键词
coefficient of variation; evaluation indicator system; FGH95 superalloy; laser shock processing; turbine disk; VIKOR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many influencing factors and characterization indicators of the laser shock processing (LSP) quality make it difficult to evaluate the processing quality comprehensively and economically. Furthermore, there is no systematic and comprehensive evaluation system for the LSP quality. Therefore, this article combines the coefficient of variation (CV) and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods to establish an evaluation model. The model was used to evaluate the strengthening quality of the FGH95 superalloy to manufacture helicopter turbine disks after the LSP orthogonal test. The results show that when the laser energy is 8 J, the beam diameter is 5 mm and the number of impacts is 2, the compromise decision indicator value is 0.1806, with the relatively best strengthening effect for the FGH95 superalloy. Under the index weight set in this paper, the comprehensive material properties of the FGH95 superalloy is improved by 3.25 times compared with the unimpacted sample. The CV-VIKOR method has good stability and reliability, enabling efficient, comprehensive, and scientific evaluation and comparison of enhanced quality of different processed samples. This method has an essential reference and guiding significance for reducing the experimental workload, saving experimental costs, and promoting and applying the LSP technology.
引用
收藏
页码:3299 / 3308
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Laser Shock Processing Quality of a Superalloy Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology
    Wu, Hebin
    Zeng, Jingling
    Zhang, Qi
    Lin, Chaohui
    Liu, Fuxiang
    Guo, Xiaojun
    Chi, Yuanqing
    Zhang, Yongkang
    Chen, Xiaolei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 33 (07) : 3299 - 3308
  • [2] Preliminary Evaluation of Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methodology for Emergency Management
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammell, Robert J., II
    Raglin, Adrienne J.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS AND SYSTEM INTERACTIONS, 2021, 265 : 11 - 18
  • [3] Safety evaluation methodology of urban public parks by multi-criteria decision making
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Bausys, Romualdas
    Mazonaviciute, Ingrida
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 189 : 372 - 381
  • [4] On the Integration of User Preferences by Using a Hybrid Methodology for Multi-Criteria Decision Making
    Andreou, Andreas
    Mavromoustakis, Constandinos X.
    Markakis, Evangelos K.
    Song, Houbing
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 139157 - 139170
  • [5] EVALUATION OF TRANSPORT PROJECTS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHOD
    Macura, Dragana
    Bojovic, Nebojsa
    Nuhodzic, Resad
    Selmic, Milica
    Boskovic, Branislav
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING (ICTTE), 2012, : 547 - 554
  • [6] A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Method for the Financial Statement Quality Evaluation
    Nguyen Thi Hoai Thuong
    Li, Zongmin
    Phi Thi Diem Hong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 502 : 659 - 676
  • [7] Combat Aircraft Effectiveness Assessment Using Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology
    Wibowo, Agus Suryo
    ErnaPermanasari, Adhistya
    Fauziati, Silmi
    [J]. 2016 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-COMPUTER (ICST), 2016,
  • [8] Multi-criteria methodology contribution to the software quality evaluation
    Blin, MJ
    Tsoukiàs, A
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY JOURNAL, 2001, 9 (02) : 113 - 132
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Methodology Contribution to the Software Quality Evaluation
    Marie-José Blin
    Alexis Tsoukiàs
    [J]. Software Quality Journal, 2001, 9 : 113 - 132
  • [10] An integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for health technology assessment
    Karatas, Mumtaz
    Karacan, Ilknur
    Tozan, Hakan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (04) : 504 - 534