How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Frank J. van Rijnsoever
Laurens K. Hessels
机构
[1] Utrecht University,Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development
[2] Universitat Politècnica de València,INGENIO (CSIC
[3] Rathenau Instituut,UPV)
[4] Leiden University,Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)
来源
关键词
University–industry interaction; Research collaboration; Choice experiment; Academic engagement; O31; O38;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although many studies have been conducted on the drivers of and barriers to research collaborations, current literature provides limited insights into the ways in which individual researchers choose to engage in different collaborative projects. Using a choice experiment, we studied the factors that drive this choice using a representative sample of 3145 researchers from Western Europe and North America who publish in English. We find that for most researchers, the expected publication of research in scientific journals deriving from a project is the most decisive factor driving their collaboration choices. Moreover, most respondents prefer to collaborate with other partners than industry. However, different factors’ influence varies across groups of researchers. These groups are characterised as going for the ‘puzzle’ (60% of the sample), the ‘ribbon’ (33%) or the ‘gold’ (8%), i.e., primarily oriented toward intellectual goals, recognition or money, respectively. This heterogeneity shows that a combination of interventions will be required for governments aiming to promote university–industry collaborations.
引用
收藏
页码:1917 / 1948
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How academic researchers select collaborative research projects: a choice experiment
    van Rijnsoever, Frank J.
    Hessels, Laurens K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2021, 46 (06): : 1917 - 1948
  • [2] How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchers
    Bozeman, Barry
    Gaughan, Monica
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (10) : 1393 - 1402
  • [3] HOW REPRESENTATIVE ARE VOLUNTEER PHYSICIANS IN COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROJECTS
    HOOGEWERF, PE
    ALLINGHAM, JD
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1985, 31 (AUG) : 1473 - 1474
  • [4] Reasons for collaborating in inclusive research projects: The perspectives of researchers with experiential knowledge, academic researchers and principal investigators
    van den Bogaard, Kim H. J. M.
    Frielink, Noud
    Giesbers, Sanne A. H.
    Schippers, Alice
    Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2023, 20 (04) : 415 - 427
  • [5] Academic research and researchers
    Montgomery, Catherine
    [J]. STUDIES IN CONTINUING EDUCATION, 2011, 33 (02) : 200 - 202
  • [6] How do researchers choose their goals of inference? A survey experiment on the effects of the state of research and method preferences on the choice between research goals
    Bethke, Felix
    Rohlfing, Ingo
    [J]. RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2023, 10 (02)
  • [7] How design professionals learn within collaborative research projects
    Zielhuis, Marieke
    Visser, Froukje Sleeswijk
    Andriessen, Daan
    Stappers, Pieter Jan
    [J]. CODESIGN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COCREATION IN DESIGN AND THE ARTS, 2024,
  • [8] CHOICE OF RESEARCH PROJECTS
    不详
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1965, 57 (02): : 14 - &
  • [9] HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD
    BRANS, JP
    VINCKE, P
    MARESCHAL, B
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) : 228 - 238
  • [10] Early career researchers' perceptions of collaborative research in the context of academic capitalism on the Chinese Mainland
    Lai, Manhong
    Li, Linlin
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 39 (07) : 1474 - 1487