The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion

被引:0
|
作者
Jean H. M. Wagemans
机构
[1] University of Amsterdam,
来源
Argumentation | 2011年 / 25卷
关键词
Argumentation from expert opinion; Argument scheme; Critical questions; Walton; Pragma-dialectics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this contribution, I will develop a comprehensive tool for the reconstruction and evaluation of argumentation from expert opinion. This is done by analyzing and then combining two dialectical accounts of this type of argumentation. Walton’s account of the ‘appeal to expert opinion’ provides a number of useful, but fairly unsystematic suggestions for critical questions pertaining to argumentation from expert opinion. The pragma-dialectical account of ‘argumentation from authority’ offers a clear and systematic, but fairly general framework for the reconstruction and evaluation of this type of argumentation. The tool is developed by incorporating Walton’s critical questions into a pragma-dialectical framework.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 339
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion
    Wagemans, Jean H. M.
    [J]. ARGUMENTATION, 2011, 25 (03) : 329 - 339
  • [2] PROBLEMS IN THE USE OF EXPERT OPINION IN ARGUMENTATION
    WALTON, DN
    [J]. COMMUNICATION AND COGNITION, 1989, 22 (3-4): : 383 - 389
  • [3] Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems
    Walton D.
    Koszowy M.
    [J]. AI Soc., 4 (483-496): : 483 - 496
  • [4] An approach to argumentation schemes that appeal to expert opinion
    [J]. 1600, Asociacion Espanola de Inteligencia Artificial (16):
  • [5] Erratum to: Arguments from authority and expert opinion in computational argumentation systems
    Douglas Walton
    Marcin Koszowy
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2017, 32 (4) : 497 - 498
  • [6] Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion
    Walton, Douglas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2006, 38 (05) : 745 - 777
  • [7] The Reasonableness of Argumentation from Expert Opinion in Medical Discussions: Institutional Safeguards for the Quality of Shared Decision Making
    Henkemans, A. F. Snoeck
    Wagemans, J. H. M.
    [J]. BETWEEN SCIENTISTS AND CITIZENS, 2012, : 345 - 354
  • [8] Challenges of mucositis assessment in children: Expert opinion
    Tomlinson, Deborah
    Gibson, Faith
    Treister, Nathaniel
    Baggott, Christina
    Judd, Peter
    Hendershot, Eleanor
    Maloney, Anne-Marie
    Doyle, John
    Feldman, Brian
    Sung, Lillian
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (05) : 469 - 475
  • [9] Expert opinion and probabilistic volcanic risk assessment
    Donovan, Amy
    Eiser, J. Richard
    Sparks, R. Stephen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2017, 20 (06) : 693 - 710
  • [10] Problems with expert opinion for the assessment of septic arthritis
    Neugebauer, C
    Graf, R
    [J]. ORTHOPADE, 2004, 33 (04): : 483 - 493