VR as a choice: what drives learners’ technology acceptance?

被引:0
|
作者
Sean M. Noble
Jason D. Saville
Lori L. Foster
机构
[1] North Carolina State University,Department of Psychology
关键词
Technology acceptance; Virtual reality; Post-secondary education; Relative weight analysis; UTAUT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Post-secondary institutions are investing in and utilizing virtual reality (VR) for many educational purposes, including as a discretionary learning tool. Institutions such as vocational schools, community colleges, and universities need to understand what psychological factors drive students’ acceptance of VR for learning in discretionary contexts. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT; Venkatesh et al. in MIS Quarterly 27:425–478, 2003) offers a theoretical framework for understanding students’ receptivity to VR for learning. Undergraduate university students (N = 300) read a description of VR and video training mediums, then indicated which they would choose to learn a novel task. Three psychological variables—performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence—tended to be related to acceptance of VR, which was measured in two ways: (a) rated intentions to use VR and (b) preference for VR over a video-based alternative. Relative weight analyses compared the importance of the three predictors and revealed that performance expectancy tended to be the most influential antecedent of VR acceptance.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] VR as a choice: what drives learners' technology acceptance?
    Noble, Sean M.
    Saville, Jason D.
    Foster, Lori L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [2] What drives choice in drives?
    Anon
    [J]. Design Engineering (London), 2001, (JUNE.): : 22 - 23
  • [3] What Drives Construction Practitioners' Acceptance of Intelligent Surveillance Systems? An Extended Technology Acceptance Model
    Lu, Ying
    Deng, Yunxuan
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [4] What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model
    Wu, JH
    Wang, SC
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 42 (05) : 719 - 729
  • [5] What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?
    Currall, Steven C.
    King, Eden B.
    Lane, Neal
    Madera, Juan
    Turner, Stacey
    [J]. NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (03) : 153 - 155
  • [6] What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?
    Steven C. Currall
    Eden B. King
    Neal Lane
    Juan Madera
    Stacey Turner
    [J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2006, 1 : 153 - 155
  • [7] WHAT DRIVES TECHNOLOGY
    KAPLAN, AR
    [J]. MINI-MICRO SYSTEMS, 1983, 16 (14): : 8 - 8
  • [8] What drives students' intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model
    Zheng, Juan
    Li, Shan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 102
  • [9] What drives visitor economy crowdfunding? The effect of digital storytelling on unified theory of acceptance and use of technology
    Kim, Myung Ja
    Hall, C. Michael
    [J]. TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 34
  • [10] What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model
    Singh, Shubhangi
    Sahni, Marshal M.
    Kovid, Raj K.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2020, 58 (08) : 1675 - 1697