Active Ising Models of flocking: a field-theoretic approach

被引:5
|
作者
Scandolo M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pausch J. [4 ]
Cates M.E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dip. di Fisica, Università Sapienza, Rome
[2] Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Rome
[3] DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge
[4] Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London
来源
European Physical Journal E | 2023年 / 46卷 / 10期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
All Open Access; Hybrid Gold; Green;
D O I
10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00364-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Abstract: Using an approach based on Doi-Peliti field theory, we study several different Active Ising Models (AIMs), in each of which collective motion (flocking) of self-propelled particles arises from the spontaneous breaking of a discrete symmetry. We test the predictive power of our field theories by deriving the hydrodynamic equations for the different microscopic choices of aligning processes that define our various models. At deterministic level, the resulting equations largely confirm known results, but our approach has the advantage of allowing systematic generalization to include noise terms. Study of the resulting hydrodynamics allows us to confirm that the various AIMs share the same phenomenology of a first-order transition from isotropic to flocked states whenever the self-propulsion speed is nonzero, with an important exception for the case where particles align only pairwise locally. Remarkably, this variant fails entirely to give flocking—an outcome that was foreseen in previous work, but is confirmed here and explained in terms of the scalings of various terms in the hydrodynamic limit. Finally, we discuss our AIMs in the limit of zero self-propulsion where the ordering transition is continuous. In this limit, each model is still out of equilibrium because the dynamical rules continue to break detailed balance, yet it has been argued that an equilibrium universality class (Model C) prevails. We study field-theoretically the connection between our AIMs and Model C, arguing that these particular models (though not AIMs in general) lie outside the Model C class. We link this to the fact that in our AIMs without self-propulsion, detailed balance is not merely still broken, but replaced by a different dynamical symmetry in which the dynamics of the particle density is independent of the spin state. Graphical Abstract:.[Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supersymmetric field-theoretic models on a supermanifold
    Franco, DHT
    Polito, CMM
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 45 (04) : 1447 - 1473
  • [2] Supersymmetric field-theoretic models on a supermanifold
    Polito, CMM
    Franco, DHT
    SUGRA20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 20 YEARS OF SUGRA, SEARCH FOR SUSY AND UNIFICATION, 2004, : 606 - 612
  • [3] A Field-Theoretic Approach to the Wiener Sausage
    S. Nekovar
    G. Pruessner
    Journal of Statistical Physics, 2016, 163 : 604 - 641
  • [4] A Field-Theoretic Approach to the Wiener Sausage
    Nekovar, S.
    Pruessner, G.
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 163 (03) : 604 - 641
  • [5] Field-theoretic approach to the Lifshitz point
    Mergulhao, C
    Carneiro, CEI
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1998, 58 (10) : 6047 - 6056
  • [6] ISING MODEL - FIELD-THEORETIC AND FUNCTIONAL-INTEGRAL ASPECTS
    HELFAND, E
    PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1969, 180 (02): : 600 - +
  • [7] FIELD-THEORETIC APPROACH TO ATOMIC SCATTERING
    DAS, JN
    ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 1972, 28 (01) : 6 - &
  • [8] FIELD-THEORETIC APPROACH TO RHO MESON
    ALEXANIAN, M
    WELLNER, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1965, 137 (1B): : B155 - +
  • [9] Simulations of polymer solutions: A field-theoretic approach
    Alexander-Katz, A
    Moreira, AG
    Fredrickson, GH
    MESOSCALE PHENOMENA IN FLUID SYSTEMS, 2003, 861 : 279 - 289
  • [10] Field-theoretic approach to the universality of branching processes
    Garcia-Millan, Rosalba
    Pausch, Johannes
    Walter, Benjamin
    Pruessner, Gunnar
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2018, 98 (06)