Integrating resilience into floodplain restoration

被引:17
|
作者
David Hulse
Stan Gregory
机构
[1] University of Oregon,Department of Landscape Architecture
[2] Oregon State University,Department of Fisheries & Wildlife
关键词
floodplain restoration prioritization;
D O I
10.1023/B:UECO.0000044041.94705.52
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores the role of geographic prioritization as a means of identifying lands that are especially well suited to restoration in the historical floodplain of western Oregon's Willamette River. The river and its floodplain have been extensively modified since 1850. As a result, the quantity and quality of river habitat have declined. The approach illustrated here explicitly links the potential for ecological benefits from restoration with the social and economic likelihood of restoration success. Using a consistent analytical framework, longitudinal patterns in selected biophysical and socioeconomic characteristics are quantified along the entire river length, from Eugene to Portland. Areas with high potential for ecological recovery and low socioeconomic constraints have the greatest potential for future restoration. Areas that combine low potential for ecological response with high demographic and economic costs are likely to be poor choices for restoration. Areas with high ecological potential and intermediate levels of socioeconomic constraints present intermediate opportunities for restoration. The paper identifies high priority locations for restoration, assuming the purposes of restoration are to increase river channel complexity, increase floodplain forest area, and increase natural water storage during floods. It concludes by discussing the role of visualizations in citizen involvement.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 314
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating the resilience concept into ecosystem restoration
    Ren, Jonathan Wei Fung
    Coffman, Gretchen Christina
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2023, 31 (05)
  • [2] Integrating social and ecological considerations in floodplain relocation and restoration programs
    Shi L.
    Sylman S.
    Hulet C.
    Brenner R.M.
    Safi A.G.
    Corsi P.
    Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2023, 5 (3) : 239 - 251
  • [3] A roadmap to integrating resilience into the practice of coral reef restoration
    Shaver, Elizabeth C.
    McLeod, Elizabeth
    Hein, Margaux Y.
    Palumbi, Stephen R.
    Quigley, Kate
    Vardi, Tali
    Mumby, Peter J.
    Smith, David
    Montoya-Maya, Phanor
    Muller, Erinn M.
    Banaszak, Anastazia T.
    McLeod, Ian M.
    Wachenfeld, David
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (16) : 4751 - 4764
  • [4] Floodplain restoration in the Danube floodplain national park
    Baumgartner, Christian
    WASSERWIRTSCHAFT, 2019, 109 (11) : 24 - 29
  • [5] Restoration of floodplain rivers: The 'Danube restoration project'
    Schiemer, F
    Baumgartner, C
    Tockner, K
    REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1999, 15 (1-3): : 231 - 244
  • [6] Coral restoration for coastal resilience: Integrating ecology, hydrodynamics, and engineering at multiple scales
    Viehman, T. Shay
    Reguero, Borja G.
    Lenihan, Hunter S.
    Rosman, Johanna H.
    Storlazzi, Curt D.
    Goergen, Elizabeth A.
    Silander, Miguel F.
    Groves, Sarah H.
    Holstein, Daniel M.
    Bruckner, Andrew W.
    Carrick, Jane V.
    Haus, Brian K.
    Royster, Julia B.
    Duvall, Melissa S.
    Torres, Walter I.
    Hench, James L.
    ECOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05):
  • [7] The resilience of a floodplain vegetation landscape
    Rajendra L. Shilpakar
    Martin C. Thoms
    Michael A. Reid
    Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36 : 139 - 157
  • [8] Floodplain forests and river restoration
    Sterba, O
    Mekotova, J
    Krskova, M
    Samsonova, P
    Harper, D
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY LETTERS, 1997, 6 (3-4): : 331 - 337
  • [9] The resilience of a floodplain vegetation landscape
    Shilpakar, Rajendra L.
    Thoms, Martin C.
    Reid, Michael A.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (01) : 139 - 157
  • [10] RESTORATION OF FLOODPLAIN FORESTS IN BRITAIN
    PETERKEN, GF
    HUGHES, FMR
    FORESTRY, 1995, 68 (03): : 187 - 202