Analysis of the causes of variability of the dry leaf mass-per-area ratio

被引:1
|
作者
S. P. Vasfilov
机构
[1] Russian Academy of Sciences,Botanic Garden, Urals Branch
关键词
Leaf Area; Specific Leaf Area; Leaf Trait; Leaf Thickness; Biology Bulletin Review;
D O I
10.1134/S2079086412030061
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The lamina dry mass-area ratio (LMA: Leaf Mass per Area) is a very variable characteristic. Leaf dry mass consists of symplast mass (the set of all leaf protoplasts) and apoplast mass (the set of all cell walls in a leaf). The ratio between symplast and apoplast masses is positively related to any functional leaf trait calculated per unit of dry mass. The value of this ratio is defined by cell size and the number of cells per unit of leaf area, by the number of mesophyll cell layers and their differentiation into palisade and spongy ones, and also by cell packing density. The LMA value is determined by leaf thickness and density. The extent and direction of variability in both leaf traits determine the extent and direction of variability in LMA. A negative correlation between leaf thickness and density reduces the variability of LMA. As a consequence of this correlation, the following pattern emerges: the thinner a leaf, the denser it is. Changes in the traits that determine the LMA value take place both within a species under the influence of environmental factors and between species that differ in leaf structure and functions. Light is the most powerful environmental factor that influences LMA, with an increase in illumination leading to an increase in LMA. This effect occurs during leaf growth at the expense of structural changes associated with the reduction of the symplast-apoplast mass ratio. Under intense illumination, LMA may increase due to accumulation of starch. With regard to the majority of leaf functions, the mass of the starch may be ascribed to apoplast. Starch accumulation in leaves is also observed under conditions of elevated CO2 concentration in the air. Under high illumination, however, LMA increases also due to increased apoplast contribution to leaf dry mass. A low level of mineral nutrition leads to LMA increase due to a lowering of growthzone demands for phothosynthates and, therefore, to an increase in starch content in leaves. A high level of mineral nutrition during leaf growth leads to LMA increase at the expense of mesophyll thickening where components of the photosynthesis system are located. When additional environmental factors are involved, starch accumulation may be partly responsible for the increase in LMA. The LMA increase at the expense of starch accumulation, unlike that which occurs at the expense of mesophyll thickening, is accompanied by an increase in leaf density. LMA increases under conditions of water deficiency, which in mature leaves may be caused by starch accumulation. LMA increase during the leaf growth period under conditions of water deficiency is associated with a decrease in the symplast-apoplast mass ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 253
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The analysis of the causes of variability of the relationship between leaf dry mass and area in plants
    Vasfilov, S. P.
    ZHURNAL OBSHCHEI BIOLOGII, 2011, 72 (06): : 436 - 454
  • [2] Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis
    Poorter, Hendrik
    Niinemets, Uelo
    Poorter, Lourens
    Wright, Ian J.
    Villar, Rafael
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2009, 182 (03) : 565 - 588
  • [3] Predictability of Leaf Morphological Traits for Paleoecological Reconstruction: The Case of Leaf Cuticle and Leaf Dry Mass per Area
    Veromann-Jurgenson, Linda-Liisa
    Brodribb, Timothy J.
    Laanisto, Lauri
    Bruun-Lund, Sam
    Niinemets, Ulo
    Nuno, Samuel Liga
    Rinnan, Riikka
    Puglielli, Giacomo
    Tosens, Tiina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 2020, 181 (01) : 129 - 141
  • [4] No Consistent Shift in Leaf Dry Mass per Area Across the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary
    Butrim, Matthew J.
    Royer, Dana L.
    Miller, Ian M.
    Dechesne, Marieke
    Neu-Yagle, Nicole
    Lyson, Tyler R.
    Johnson, Kirk R.
    Barclay, Richard S.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [5] Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis (vol 182, pg 565, 2009)
    Poorter, H.
    Niinemets, U.
    Poorter, L.
    Wright, I. J.
    Villar, R.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2009, 183 (04) : 1222 - 1222
  • [6] Influence of leaf dry mass per area, CO2, and irradiance on mesophyll conductance in sclerophylls
    Hassiotou, Foteini
    Ludwig, Martha
    Renton, Michael
    Veneklaas, Erik J.
    Evans, John R.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2009, 60 (08) : 2303 - 2314
  • [7] Estimating leaf mass per area with leaf radiative transfer model
    Shi, Hanyu
    Jiang, Jingyi
    Jacquemoud, Stephane
    Xiao, Zhiqiang
    Ma, Mingguo
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 286
  • [8] The anatomical and compositional basis of leaf mass per area
    John, Grace P.
    Scoffoni, Christine
    Buckley, Thomas N.
    Villar, Rafael
    Poorter, Hendrik
    Sack, Lawren
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 20 (04) : 412 - 425
  • [9] Arboreal Urban Cooling Is Driven by Leaf Area Index, Leaf Boundary Layer Resistance, and Dry Leaf Mass per Leaf Area: Evidence from a System Dynamics Model
    Eyster, Harold N.
    Beckage, Brian
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (03)
  • [10] Components of leaf dry mass per area - thickness and density - alter leaf photosynthetic capacity in reverse directions in woody plants
    Niinemets, U
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1999, 144 (01) : 35 - 47