A Study of Promethazine Hydrochloride and Pentazocine Intramuscular Sedation Along with 2 % Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Adrenaline and Comparison to Placebo Along with 2 % Lidocaine Hydrochloride and Adrenaline for Surgical Extraction of Mandibular Third Molar

被引:1
|
作者
Lalfamkima F. [1 ]
Debnath S.C. [1 ,2 ]
Adhyapok A.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Regional Dental College, Guwahati, 781005, Assam
[2] Sai Dental Clinic and Facio-Maxillary Surgery Centre, Rajgarh Road, Bhangagarh, Opposite Alcare Diagnostic Centre, House No. 148, Guwahati, 781005, Assam
关键词
Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS); Ramsey sedation score (RSS); Visual analogue scale (VAS);
D O I
10.1007/s12663-013-0595-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: The main objective is to study and compare the sedative and analgesic effects of intramuscular injection fortwin–phenergan along with local anesthetic and normal saline placebo along with local anesthetics in mandibular third molar surgery. We also assessed and compared the postoperative experience of the patient in relation to the pain intensity, time to first analgesic taken and total number of analgesics consumed over a period of 48 h in the two groups. Materials and Methods: Patients who came to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Regional Dental College; with complaints regarding mandibular third molar were chosen for the treatment. Patients were evaluated using Corah Dental Anxiety Scale (CDAS) and those patients having a score of CDAS 13 and above were selected. Sixty patients were selected out of which 30 patients formed group 1 and another 30 patients group 2. The patients were randomly divided with flip method into group 1 (study group) and or group 2 (controlled group). Results: Our study results showed that the operating conditions for both the groups at the end of surgery were similar without significant difference. Most of the surgical procedures were graded as excellent and good in both the groups except that difficulty was encountered in two patients from group 1 and one from group 2. Conclusion: It could be concluded that particular drugs do not have much influence on the surgical procedure in our study, but it was found that patients from group 1 were more cooperative as compared to group 2 when difficulty was encountered during the surgical procedure. © 2013, Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with clonidine hydrochloride versus 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline bitartrate as local anesthetic for adult patients undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A randomized controlled clinical study
    Gupte, Shreyas H.
    Kalra, Rinku D.
    Dcruz, Thomson M.
    Kamble, Sahil
    Patnaik, Ranjana S.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2021, 12 (03) : 308 - 312
  • [2] Efficacy of Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline, Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine for Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Research Protocol for a Randomised Clinical Trial
    Doshi, Akash Yogesh
    Bhola, Nitin Dharmpal
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2020, 17 (04) : ZK1 - ZK5
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
    Goyal, Ram
    Sharma, Parveen
    Bali, Rishi
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2021, 20 (02): : 234 - 239
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
    Ram Goyal
    Parveen Sharma
    Rishi Bali
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2021, 20 : 234 - 239
  • [6] Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique
    Vishal, G.
    Dandriyal, R.
    Indra, N. B.
    Singh, H. P.
    Chaurasia, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 59 (07): : 783 - 787
  • [7] Re: Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique
    Crofts, Emma
    Williams, John
    Corsar, Kenneth
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (04): : 527 - 527
  • [8] Response letter to the "Letter to editor:" to our article Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique
    Vishal, Gaurav
    Dandriyal, Ramakant
    Indra, B. Niranjanaprasad
    Singh, Himanshu Pratap
    Chaurasia, Archana
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (04): : 528 - 528
  • [9] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine HCl with different epinephrine concentration for local anesthesia in participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover, phase IV trial
    Karm, Myong-Hwan
    Park, Fiona Daye
    Kang, Moonkyu
    Kim, Hyun Jeong
    Kang, Jeong Wan
    Kim, Seungoh
    Kim, Yong-Deok
    Kim, Cheul-Hong
    Seo, Kwang-Suk
    Kwon, Kyung-Hwan
    Kim, Chul-Hwan
    Lee, Jung-Woo
    Hong, Sung-Woon
    Lim, Mi Hyoung
    Nam, Seung Kwan
    Cho, Jae Min
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (21)