共 9 条
- [1] Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with clonidine hydrochloride versus 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline bitartrate as local anesthetic for adult patients undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A randomized controlled clinical study CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2021, 12 (03) : 308 - 312
- [4] Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2021, 20 (02): : 234 - 239
- [5] Comparative Analysis of the Anesthetic Efficacy of 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:80,000) for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2021, 20 : 234 - 239
- [6] Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 59 (07): : 783 - 787
- [7] Re: Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (04): : 527 - 527
- [8] Response letter to the "Letter to editor:" to our article Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 60 (04): : 528 - 528