A New Method for Resolving the 180° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetograms

被引:0
|
作者
Y.-J. Moon
Haimin Wang
Thomas J. Spirock
P.R. Goode
Y.D. Park
机构
[1] NJIT,Big Bear Solar Observatory
[2] Korea Astronomy Observatory,undefined
[3] Whaamdong,undefined
[4] Yuseong-gu,undefined
来源
Solar Physics | 2003年 / 217卷
关键词
Current Density Distribution; Azimuthal Component; Polarity Inversion Line; Transverse Vector; Polarity Inversion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a new method to resolve the 180° ambiguity for solar vector magnetogram measurements. The basic assumption is that the magnetic shear angle (Δθ), which is defined as the difference between the azimuth components of observed and potential fields, approximately follows a normal distribution. The new method is composed of three steps. First, we apply the potential field method to determine the azimuthal components of the observed magnetic fields. Second, we resolve the ambiguity with a new criterion: −90°+ΔθmpleΔθle90°+Δθmp, where Δθmp is the most probable value of magnetic shear angle from its number distribution. Finally, to remove some localized field discontinuities, we use the criterion Bt⋅Bmtge0, where Bt and Bmt are an observed transverse field and its mean value for a small surrounding region, respectively. For an illustration, we have applied the new ambiguity removal method (Uniform Shear Method) to a vector magnetogram which covers a highly sheared region near the polarity inversion line of NOAA AR 0039. As a result, we have found that the new ambiguity solution was successful and removed spatial discontinuities in the transverse vector fields produced in the magnetogram by the potential field method. It is also found that our solution to the ambiguity gives nearly the same results, for highly sheared vector magnetograms and vertical current density distributions, of NOAA AR 5747 and AR 6233 as those of other methods. The validity of the basic assumption for an approximate normal distribution is demonstrated by the number distributions of magnetic shear angle for the three active regions under consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 94
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new method for resolving the 180° ambiguity in solar vector magnetograms
    Moon, YJ
    Wang, HM
    Spirock, TJ
    Goode, PR
    Park, YD
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2003, 217 (01) : 79 - 94
  • [2] On the resolution of the azimuthal ambiguity in vector magnetograms of solar active regions
    Georgoulis, MK
    LaBonte, BJ
    Metcalf, TR
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 602 (01): : 446 - 467
  • [3] A Method of Resolving the 180-Degree Ambiguity by Employing the Chirality of Solar Features
    S. F. Martin
    Y. Lin
    O. Engvold
    Solar Physics, 2008, 250 : 31 - 51
  • [4] A method of resolving the 180-degree ambiguity by employing the chirality of solar features
    Martin, S. F.
    Lin, Y.
    Engvold, O.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2008, 250 (01) : 31 - 51
  • [5] Resolving the 180° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions
    K. D. Leka
    Graham Barnes
    A. D. Crouch
    Thomas R. Metcalf
    G. Allen Gary
    Ju Jing
    Y. Liu
    Solar Physics, 2009, 260 : 83 - 108
  • [6] A SPECTROSCOPIC METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF THE 180-DEGREES AZIMUTH AMBIGUITY IN MAGNETOGRAMS
    DEGL'INNOCENTI, EL
    BOMMIER, V
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 411 (01): : L49 - L52
  • [7] Resolving the 180A° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions
    Leka, K. D.
    Barnes, Graham
    Crouch, A. D.
    Metcalf, Thomas R.
    Gary, G. Allen
    Jing, Ju
    Liu, Y.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2009, 260 (01) : 83 - 108
  • [8] Comment on “Resolving the 180° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions”
    Manolis K. Georgoulis
    Solar Physics, 2012, 276 : 423 - 440
  • [9] Response to “Comment on ‘Resolving the 180° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions’ ”
    K. D. Leka
    Graham Barnes
    G. Allen Gary
    A. D. Crouch
    Y. Liu
    Solar Physics, 2012, 276 : 441 - 450
  • [10] Comment on "Resolving the 180A° Ambiguity in Solar Vector Magnetic Field Data: Evaluating the Effects of Noise, Spatial Resolution, and Method Assumptions"
    Georgoulis, Manolis K.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2012, 276 (1-2) : 423 - 440