Minimum winning versus oversized coalitions in public finance: the role of uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
Tsung-Sheng Tsai
C. C. Yang
机构
[1] National Tsing Hua University,Department of Economics
[2] Academia Sinica,Institute of Economics
[3] National Chengchi University,Department of Public Finance
[4] Feng Chia University,Department of Public Finance
来源
Social Choice and Welfare | 2010年 / 34卷
关键词
Agenda Setter; Public Good Provision; Winning Coalition; Coalition Member; Political Agent;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper extends Persson et al.’s (J Polit Econ 108:1121–1161, 2000) simple legislature in the context of public finance with certainty to uncertainty. In our uncertain world, oversized coalitions (OSCs) as well as minimum winning coalitions (MWCs) may arise in equilibrium, and the agenda setter’s proposed policy may fail to receive a majority support. This is in marked contrast to the certain world, in which only MWCs can arise in equilibrium and the agenda setter’s proposal never fails to pass. When OSCs arise, we show that both public good provision and redistribution are likely to achieve their first-best solution, even if the legislature is simple.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 361
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条