Glycoalkaloids of Wild and Cultivated Solanum: Effects on Specialist and Generalist Insect Herbivores

被引:0
|
作者
Paula Altesor
Álvaro García
Elizabeth Font
Alejandra Rodríguez-Haralambides
Francisco Vilaró
Martín Oesterheld
Roxina Soler
Andrés González
机构
[1] Universidad de la República,Facultad de Química
[2] Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA)-Las Brujas,Ifeva, Facultad de Agronomía
[3] Universidad de Buenos Aires/Conicet,undefined
[4] Department of Terrestrial Ecology,undefined
[5] Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW),undefined
来源
关键词
Plant defense; Glycoalkaloids; Herbivore specialization; Plant domestication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Plant domestication by selective breeding may reduce plant chemical defense in favor of growth. However, few studies have simultaneously studied the defensive chemistry of cultivated plants and their wild congeners in connection to herbivore susceptibility. We compared the constitutive glycoalkaloids (GAs) of cultivated potato, Solanum tuberosum, and a wild congener, S. commersonii, by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. We also determined the major herbivores present on the two species in field plots, and tested their preference for the plants and their isolated GAs in two-choice bioassays. Solanum commersonii had a different GA profile and higher concentrations than S. tuberosum. In the field, S. tuberosum was mostly attacked by the generalist aphids Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae, and by the specialist flea beetle Epitrix argentinensis. In contrast, the most common herbivore on S. commersonii was the specialist sawfly Tequus sp. Defoliation levels were higher on the wild species, probably due to the chewing feeding behavior of Tequus sp. As seen in the field, M. persicae and E. argentinensis preferred leaf disks of the cultivated plant, while Tequus sp. preferred those of the wild one. Congruently, GAs from S. commersonii were avoided by M. persicae and preferred by Tequus sp. The potato aphid performed well on both species and was not deterred by S. commersonii GAs. These observations suggest that different GA profiles explain the feeding preferences of the different herbivores, and that domestication has altered the defensive capacity of S. tuberosum. However, the wild relative is still subject to severe defoliation by a specialist herbivore that may cue on the GAs.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 608
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Glycoalkaloids of Wild and Cultivated Solanum Effects on Specialist and Generalist Insect Herbivores
    Altesor, Paula
    Garcia, Alvaro
    Font, Elizabeth
    Rodriguez-Haralambides, Alejandra
    Vilaro, Francisco
    Oesterheld, Martin
    Soler, Roxina
    Gonzalez, Andres
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 40 (06) : 599 - 608
  • [2] Performance of generalist and specialist herbivores and their endoparasitoids differs on cultivated and wild Brassica populations
    Gols, Rieta
    Bukovinszky, Tibor
    van Dam, Nicole M.
    Dicke, Marcel
    Bullock, James M.
    Harvey, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 34 (02) : 132 - 143
  • [3] Performance of Generalist and Specialist Herbivores and their Endoparasitoids Differs on Cultivated and Wild Brassica Populations
    Rieta Gols
    Tibor Bukovinszky
    Nicole M. van Dam
    Marcel Dicke
    James M. Bullock
    Jeffrey A. Harvey
    [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2008, 34 : 132 - 143
  • [4] Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense
    Ali, Jared G.
    Agrawal, Anurag A.
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2012, 17 (05) : 293 - 302
  • [5] Immune defence strategies of generalist and specialist insect herbivores
    Barthel, Andrea
    Kopka, Isabell
    Vogel, Heiko
    Zipfel, Peter
    Heckel, David G.
    Groot, Astrid T.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1788)
  • [6] Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure
    Jonsen, ID
    Fahrig, L
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 1997, 12 (03) : 185 - 197
  • [7] Glucosinolate hydrolysis and its impact on generalist and specialist insect herbivores
    Wittstock, U
    Kliebenstein, DJ
    Lambrix, V
    Reichelt, M
    Gershenzon, J
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE PHYTOCHEMISTRY: FROM ETHNOBOTANY TO MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2003, 37 : 101 - 125
  • [8] Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure
    Ian D. Jonsen
    Lenore Fahrig
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 1997, 12 : 185 - 197
  • [9] Do plant phenolics confer resistance to specialist and generalist insect herbivores?
    Bi, JL
    Felton, GW
    Murphy, JB
    Howles, PA
    Dixon, RA
    Lamb, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 45 (11) : 4500 - 4504
  • [10] Synergistic effects of three Piper amides on generalist and specialist herbivores
    Dyer, LA
    Dodson, CD
    Stireman, JO
    Tobler, MA
    Smilanich, AM
    Fincher, RM
    Letourneau, DK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 29 (11) : 2499 - 2514