Bad peer reviewers

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

Nature | 2001年 / 413卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

A small proportion of referees are undermining the scientific process, especially in biology. Some of the problems are getting worse, partly because of changes in scientific publishing.

引用

页码：93 / 93

共 50 条

[1] Bad peer reviewers
不详
NATURE, 2001, 413 (6852) : 93 - 93
[2] Peer Review and Scientific Misconduct: Bad Authors and Trusting Reviewers
Malay, D. Scot
JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2009, 48 (03): : 283 - 284
[3] The peer reviewers
Aggarwal, Sourabh
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 26 (02) : 317 - 317
[4] PEER REVIEWERS
GILLMAN, MA
SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 63 (12): : 432 - 432
[5] Peer reviewers
Hensinger, RN
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2002, 22 (06) : 819 - 820
[6] Peer Reviewers
Economic Botany, 2013, 67 (1) : 85 - 85
[7] PEER REVIEWERS
不详
SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 63 (01): : 1 - 1
[8] Peer Reviewers
Economic Botany, 2016, 70 (1) : 101 - 101
[9] PEER REVIEWERS
Economic Botany, 2014, 68 (4) : 460 - 460
[10] Peer Reviewers
Economic Botany, 2010, 64 (1) : 93 - 93

← 1 2 3 4 5 →