Rupture directivity and source-process time of the September 20, 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake estimated from Rayleigh-wave phase velocity

被引:0
|
作者
Ruey-Der Hwang
Guey-Kuen Yu
Jeen-Hwa Wang
机构
[1] National Central University,Institute of Geophysics
[2] Academia Sinica,Institute of Earth Sciences
来源
Earth, Planets and Space | 2001年 / 53卷
关键词
Main Shock; Stress Drop; Rupture Velocity; Rupture Time; Rupture Length;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rayleigh-wave phase-delay differences between the main shock and its aftershocks, regarded as source duration varying with azimuth, at period range of 60 ∼ 120 seconds, were used to rapidly determine the rupture directivity and the source-process time of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Results show that the earthquake faulting exhibits an obvious directivity with an optimal rupture azimuth of about 42° in the northeast direction. The earthquake has an average source-process time at 40.6 ± 0.5 sec and a rupture length of 77.0 ± 3.6 km during rupture. In addition, periods at nodes of amplitude spectra of the main shock were adopted to estimate the rupture time, to be about 34.0 ± 0.7 sec; the rise time of 6.7 ± 0.6 sec, and a slightly slow rupture velocity, 2.27 ± 0.15 km/sec, were also obtained. According to Savage’s suggestion, the rupture width of the fault was estimated to be 30.5 ± 4.5 km. Relying on these estimated faults parameters, we calculate the average static stress drop of about 56 bars, lying in between the stress drop of interplate earthquakes and intraplate earthquakes. We also infer the average dynamic stress drop of 52 bars based on Brune’s theory. By the comparison of the two stress-drops, an Orowan’s stress model or a stress model of frictional overshot is probably appropriate to describe the rupture behavior of the earthquake. The radiated seismic energy, then, was estimated at about 1.9 × 1023 ergs, about 16 times larger than the value reported by the USGS.
引用
收藏
页码:1171 / 1176
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Rupture directivity and source-process time of the September 20, 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake estimated from Rayleigh-wave phase velocity
    Hwang, RD
    Yu, GK
    Wang, JH
    EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2001, 53 (12): : 1171 - 1176
  • [2] Fault rupture process of the 20 September 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake
    Zeng, YH
    Chen, CH
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 91 (05) : 1088 - 1098
  • [3] Rupture process of the Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake in 1999
    Wang, WM
    Zhao, LF
    Li, J
    Yao, ZX
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2005, 48 (01): : 132 - 147
  • [4] Dynamic rupture process of the 1999 Chi-Chi,Taiwan,earthquake
    Haiming Zhang 1
    Earthquake Science, 2009, 22 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [5] Dynamic rupture process of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake
    Zhang, WB
    Iwata, T
    Irikura, K
    Pitarka, A
    Sekiguchi, H
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (10) : L106051 - 4
  • [6] Dynamic rupture process of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake
    Zhang, Haiming
    Chen, Xiaofei
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2009, 22 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [7] Rupture process of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake from the inversion of teleseismic data
    Lee, SJ
    Ma, KF
    TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2000, 11 (03): : 591 - 608
  • [8] An observation of rupture pulses of the 20 September 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake from near-field seismograms
    Chen, KC
    Huang, BS
    Wang, JH
    Huang, WG
    Chang, TM
    Hwang, RD
    Chiu, HC
    Tsai, CCP
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 91 (05) : 1247 - 1254
  • [9] Inversion of near-field waveform data for earthquake source rupture process (Ⅱ): Inversion of Chi Chi earthquake source, 20 September, 1999, Taiwan
    ZHOU Shiyong & CHEN Xiaofei Department of Geophysics
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2006, (03) : 272 - 282
  • [10] Ground displacements around the fault of the September 20th, 1999, Chi-chi Taiwan earthquake
    Shin, TC
    Wu, FT
    Chung, JK
    Chen, RY
    Wu, YM
    Chang, CS
    Teng, TL
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (08) : 1651 - 1654