Comparison of Orthogonal Search and Canonical Variate Analysis for the Identification of Neurobiological Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Yu-Te Wu
Mingui Sun
Don Krieger
Robert J. Sclabassi
机构
[1] National Chi-Nan University,Departments of Computer Science and Information Engineering
[2] University of Pittsburgh,Laboratory for Computational Neuroscience
[3] University of Pittsburgh,Department of Neurological Surgery
[4] University of Pittsburgh,Department of Electrical Engineering
[5] University of Pittsburgh,Department of Biomedical Engineering
来源
关键词
Orthogonal search method; Canonical variate analysis; Nonlinear autoregressive moving average; State affine model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we investigate two general methods of modeling and prediction which have been applied to neurobiological systems, the orthogonal search (OS) method and the canonical variate analysis (CVA) approach. In these methods, nonlinear autoregressive moving average with observed inputs (ARX) and state affine models are developed as one step predictors by minimizing the mean-squared-error. An unknown nonlinear time-invariant system is assumed to have the Markov property of finite order so that the one step predictors are finite dimensional. No special assumptions are made about model terms, model order or state dimensions. Three examples are presented. The first is a numerical example which demonstrates the differences between the two methods, while the last two examples are computer simulations for a bilinear system and the Lorenz attractor which can serve as a model for the EEG. These two methods produce comparable results in terms of minimizing the mean-square-error; however, the OS method produces an ARX model with fewer terms, while the CVA method produces a state model with fewer state dimensions. © 1999 Biomedical Engineering Society.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 606
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of orthogonal search and canonical variate analysis for the identification of neurobiological systems
    Wu, YT
    Sun, MG
    Krieger, D
    Sclabassi, RJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 27 (05) : 592 - 606
  • [2] Identification of Nonlinear Parameter-Varying Systems via Canonical Variate Analysis
    Larimore, Wallace E.
    [J]. 2013 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2013, : 2247 - 2262
  • [3] IDENTIFICATION OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES USING CANONICAL VARIATE ANALYSIS
    SCHAPER, CD
    LARIMORE, WE
    SEBORG, DE
    MELLICHAMP, DA
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 18 (01) : 55 - 69
  • [4] Statistical optimality and canonical variate analysis system identification
    Larimore, WE
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1996, 52 (02) : 131 - 144
  • [5] Adaptive Canonical Variate Analysis for Machine Fault Detection and Identification
    Li, Xiaochuan
    Mba, David
    [J]. 2018 PROGNOSTICS AND SYSTEM HEALTH MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (PHM-CHONGQING 2018), 2018, : 774 - 779
  • [6] Canonical variate analysis-based contributions for fault identification
    Jiang, Benben
    Huang, Dexian
    Zhu, Xiaoxiang
    Yang, Fan
    Braatz, Richard D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2015, 26 : 17 - 25
  • [7] Sanger's type dynamical systems for canonical variate analysis
    Hasan, Mohammed A.
    Hasan, Jawad A. K.
    [J]. 2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 4087 - +
  • [8] ROTATION IN CANONICAL VARIATE ANALYSIS
    KRUS, DJ
    REYNOLDS, TJ
    KRUS, PH
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1976, 36 (03) : 725 - 730
  • [9] THE GEOMETRY OF CANONICAL VARIATE ANALYSIS
    CAMPBELL, NA
    ATCHLEY, WR
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1981, 30 (03): : 268 - 280
  • [10] State analysis of nonlinear systems using local canonical variate analysis
    Hunter, NF
    [J]. THIRTIETH HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, VOL 5: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, : 491 - 500