Does gender structure influence R&D efficiency? A regional perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Mingting Kou
Yi Zhang
Yu Zhang
Kaihua Chen
Jiancheng Guan
Senmao Xia
机构
[1] University of Sciences and Technology Beijing,Donglinks School of Economics and Management
[2] Guangdong Ocean University,School of Management
[3] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institutes of Innovation and Development
[4] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,School of Economics and Management
[5] Coventry University,School of Strategy and Leadership
来源
Scientometrics | 2020年 / 122卷
关键词
R&D efficiency; Gender structure; Gender gap; China’s research institutes; Region-level analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The gender structure in research and development (R&D) activities has received more and more attention in terms of its increasing importance in R&D management, but it is still not clear what the R&D efficiency discrepancy between female and male personnel is in the science and technology (S&T) field and whether the gender structure affects the R&D efficiency. Based on the region-level panel dataset of China’s research institutes, this study uses four types of R&D outputs (papers, books, patents and standards) together and individually to measure R&D efficiency score to reveal this topic. When four types of R&D outputs are jointly considered, this paper applies the multi-output stochastic frontier analysis and finds that in general the higher proportion of male R&D personnel produces the higher R&D efficiency. Nevertheless, in terms of S&T papers or S&T books as a single R&D output, we find that the higher proportion of female R&D personnel leads to the higher R&D efficiency. On the contrary, the R&D efficiency is lower with the higher proportion of female R&D personnel when the single R&D output is measured by invention patent applications or national/industrial standards, respectively. Our findings suggest that the female R&D personnel are more effective in conducting scientific research activities, while their counterparts are more effective in doing technology development activities.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 501
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does gender structure influence R&D efficiency? A regional perspective
    Kou, Mingting
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Kaihua
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Xia, Senmao
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2020, 122 (01) : 477 - 501
  • [2] Regional Perspective on R&D Policies for SMEs: Does Success Breed Success?
    Radas, Sonja
    Mervar, Andrea
    Skrinjaric, Bruno
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [3] Cooperation and the efficiency of regional R&D activities
    Fritsch, M
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 28 (06) : 829 - 846
  • [4] The Efficiency of Regional R&D Activities in China
    Li, Li
    Yang, Xinfu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 232 - 236
  • [5] Does R&D element flow promote the spatial convergence of regional carbon efficiency?
    Shang, Hua
    Jiang, Li
    Pan, Xiongfeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 322
  • [6] Research on the Measurement of Regional R&D Input Efficiency from the Perspective of Innovation Value Chain
    Gao, Zhiyong
    [J]. SECOND IYSF ACADEMIC SYMPOSIUM ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, 2021, 12079
  • [7] R&D Efficiency from the Perspective of RIS: Korea's Government Sponsored R&D Program
    Han, Jeong-Sook
    [J]. 2013 PROCEEDINGS OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE IT-DRIVEN SERVICES (PICMET'13), 2013, : 1919 - 1924
  • [8] Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to China's regional R&D systems
    Chen, Kaihua
    Kou, Mingting
    Fu, Xiaolan
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 74 : 103 - 114
  • [9] Does R&D Intensity Contribute to Technical Efficiency in Turkey?
    Kalayci, Elif
    Pamukcu, M. Teoman
    [J]. IKTISAT ISLETME VE FINANS, 2014, 29 (336): : 9 - 30
  • [10] A new perspective on industry R&D and market structure
    Lee, CY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 53 (01): : 101 - 122