Responses of turkey vultures to unmanned aircraft systems vary by platform

被引:0
|
作者
Morgan B. Pfeiffer
Bradley F. Blackwell
Thomas W. Seamans
Bruce N. Buckingham
Joshua L. Hoblet
Patrice E. Baumhardt
Travis L. DeVault
Esteban Fernández-Juricic
机构
[1] National Wildlife Research Center,U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Inspection Service, Wildlife Services
[2] Nelson Mandela University,School of Natural Resource Management, George Campus
[3] Purdue University,Department of Biological Sciences
[4] University of Georgia,Savannah River Ecology Laboratory
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A challenge that conservation practitioners face is manipulating behavior of nuisance species. The turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) can cause substantial damage to aircraft if struck. The goal of this study was to assess vulture responses to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for use as a possible dispersal tool. Our treatments included three platforms (fixed-wing, multirotor, and a predator-like ornithopter [powered by flapping flight]) and two approach types (30 m overhead or targeted towards a vulture) in an operational context. We evaluated perceived risk as probability of reaction, reaction time, flight-initiation distance (FID), vulture remaining index, and latency to return. Vultures escaped sooner in response to the fixed-wing; however, fewer remained after multirotor treatments. Targeted approaches were perceived as riskier than overhead. Vulture perceived risk was enhanced by flying the multirotor in a targeted approach. We found no effect of our treatments on FID or latency to return. Latency was negatively correlated with UAS speed, perhaps because slower UAS spent more time over the area. Greatest visual saliency followed as: ornithopter, fixed-wing, and multirotor. Despite its appearance, the ornithopter was not effective at dispersing vultures. Because effectiveness varied, multirotor/fixed-wing UAS use should be informed by management goals (immediate dispersal versus latency).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responses of turkey vultures to unmanned aircraft systems vary by platform
    Pfeiffer, Morgan B.
    Blackwell, Bradley F.
    Seamans, Thomas W.
    Buckingham, Bruce N.
    Hoblet, Joshua L.
    Baumhardt, Patrice E.
    DeVault, Travis L.
    Fernandez-Juricic, Esteban
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [2] Platform Simulation Based Unmanned Aircraft Systems Design
    Louali, Rabah
    Bouaziz, Samir
    Elouardi, Abdelhafid
    Abouzahir, Mohamed
    2014 SECOND WORLD CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX SYSTEMS (WCCS), 2014, : 736 - U753
  • [3] Unmanned aircraft systems as wingmen
    Garcia, Richard D.
    Barnes, Laura
    Fields, MaryAnne
    JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2012, 9 (01): : 5 - 15
  • [4] The Law of Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Savic, Iva
    AIR & SPACE LAW, 2023, 48 (02): : 253 - 258
  • [5] REGULATION FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
    Preseren, Peter
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2016, 60 (03) : 544 - 544
  • [6] Unmanned Aircraft Systems as Wingmen
    Garcia, Richard
    Barnes, Laura
    Fields, MaryAnne
    UNMANNED SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY XII, 2010, 7692
  • [7] The Law of Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    Kluwer, Wolters
    AIR & SPACE LAW, 2016, 41 (06): : 549 - +
  • [8] Assessing the potential disturbance effects on the use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs) for European vultures research: a review and conservation recommendations
    Zink, Richard
    Kmetova-Biro, Elena
    Agnezy, Stefan
    Klisurov, Ivaylo
    Margalida, Antoni
    BIRD CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 33
  • [9] An operability framework for unmanned aircraft systems
    Maneschijn, A.
    Jones, T.
    von Backstroem, T. W.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 115 (1168): : 361 - 376
  • [10] Unmanned Aircraft Systems and the Nordic Challenges
    Kramar, Vadim
    Roning, Juha
    Erkkila, Juha
    Hinkula, Henry
    Kolli, Tanja
    Rauhala, Anssi
    NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS OF DRONES, 2022, : 1 - 30