Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field

被引:0
|
作者
Tatiane Yanes
Mary-Anne Young
Bettina Meiser
Paul A. James
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney,Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Dermatology Research Centre,The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute
[3] University of Queensland,Parkville Integrated Familial Cancer Centre
[4] Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre,Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics
[5] Garvan Institute of Medical Research,undefined
来源
关键词
Breast cancer; Polygenic risk score; Risk prediction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Polygenic factors are estimated to account for an additional 18% of the familial relative risk of breast cancer, with those at the highest level of polygenic risk distribution having a least a twofold increased risk of the disease. Polygenic testing promises to revolutionize health services by providing personalized risk assessments to women at high-risk of breast cancer and within population breast screening programs. However, implementation of polygenic testing needs to be considered in light of its current limitations, such as limited risk prediction for women of non-European ancestry. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence for polygenic breast cancer risk, including the discovery of variants associated with breast cancer at the genome-wide level of significance and the use of polygenic risk scores to estimate breast cancer risk. We also review the different applications of this technology including testing of women from high-risk breast cancer families with uninformative genetic testing results, as a moderator of monogenic risk, and for population screening programs. Finally, a potential framework for introducing testing for polygenic risk in familial cancer clinics and the potential challenges with implementing this technology in clinical practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical applications of polygenic breast cancer risk: a critical review and perspectives of an emerging field
    Yanes, Tatiane
    Young, Mary-Anne
    Meiser, Bettina
    James, Paul A.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (01)
  • [2] Breast cancer polygenic risk scores: A review of clinical utility and the ethical, legal and social implications of an emerging field
    Yanes, Tatiane
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 77 - 78
  • [3] The emerging field of polygenic risk scores and perspective for use in clinical care
    Yanes, Tatiane
    McInerney-Leo, Aideen M.
    Law, Matthew H.
    Cummings, Shelly
    HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2020, 29 (R2) : R165 - R176
  • [4] A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Tools Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score for the General Population
    Mbuya-Bienge, Cynthia
    Pashayan, Nora
    Kazemali, Cornelia D.
    Lapointe, Julie
    Simard, Jacques
    Nabi, Hermann
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [5] Performance of a polygenic risk score combined with clinical assessment for breast cancer risk
    Black, Mary Helen
    Li, Shuwei
    LaDuca, Holly
    Armasu, Sebastian
    Polley, Eric C.
    Fitz-Gibbon, Patrick
    Scott, Chris G.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Olson, Janet E.
    Ruddy, Kathryn J.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Couch, Fergus J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [6] Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
    Hughes, Elisha
    Tshiaba, Placede
    Gallagher, Shannon
    Wagner, Susanne
    Judkins, Thaddeus
    Roa, Benjamin
    Rosenthal, Eric
    Domchek, Susan
    Garber, Judy
    Lancaster, Johnathan
    Weitzel, Jeffrey
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Lanchbury, Jerry S.
    Gutin, Alexander
    Robson, Mark
    JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 4 : 585 - 592
  • [7] Developing evidence for a polygenic breast cancer risk report: Consumers and clinicians' perspectives
    Limb, Sharne
    Purvis, Rebecca
    Wheeler, Jack
    Hilton, Matilda
    Shen, Yuhan
    Wade, Christina
    Shepherd, Rowan Forbes
    Saya, Sibel
    Emery, Jon
    James, Paul
    Forrest, Laura
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 35 - 36
  • [8] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Shieh, Yiwey
    Hu, Donglei
    Ma, Lin
    Huntsman, Scott
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Cummings, Steven R.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Ziv, Elad
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (03) : 513 - 525
  • [9] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Yiwey Shieh
    Donglei Hu
    Lin Ma
    Scott Huntsman
    Charlotte C. Gard
    Jessica W. T. Leung
    Jeffrey A. Tice
    Celine M. Vachon
    Steven R. Cummings
    Karla Kerlikowske
    Elad Ziv
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2016, 159 : 513 - 525
  • [10] Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk
    Kramer, Iris
    Hooning, Maartje J.
    Mavaddat, Nasim
    Hauptmann, Michael
    Keeman, Renske
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Giardiello, Daniele
    Antoniou, Antonis C.
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Canisius, Sander
    Abu-Ful, Zumuruda
    Andrulis, Irene L.
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    Aronson, Kristan J.
    Augustinsson, Annelie
    Becher, Heiko
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Behrens, Sabine
    Benitez, Javier
    Bermisheva, Marina
    Bogdanova, Natalia, V
    Bojesen, Stig E.
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Brauch, Hiltrud
    Bremer, Michael
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    Castelao, Jose E.
    Chan, Tsun L.
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
    Choi, Ji-Yeob
    Clarke, Christine L.
    Collee, J. Margriet
    Couch, Fergus J.
    Cox, Angela
    Cross, Simon S.
    Czene, Kamila
    Daly, Mary B.
    Devilee, Peter
    Dork, Thilo
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    Dunning, Alison M.
    Dwek, Miriam
    Eccles, Diana M.
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Fasching, Peter A.
    Flyger, Henrik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 107 (05) : 837 - 848