Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing

被引:0
|
作者
Courtney Doughty Rice
Jennifer Gamm Ruschman
Lisa J. Martin
Jennifer B. Manders
Erin Miller
机构
[1] University of Cincinnati,Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, College of Allied Health Sciences
[2] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Division of Human Genetics
[3] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[4] The Christ Hospital,Oncoplastic Surgery
[5] Sacred Heart Hospital,Heart Institute
[6] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center,undefined
来源
Familial Cancer | 2010年 / 9卷
关键词
BRCA1; BRCA2; Breast cancer; Genetic testing; Hereditary cancer; Results disclosure; Telephone counseling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 molecular genetic test results has been proposed as a feasible alternative to traditional in-person results disclosure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between method of result disclosure with the patient outcome variables of knowledge, cancer worry, cancer risk perception, satisfaction, and cancer screening and prophylactic surgery behaviors. Study participants included 228 women who completed retrospective, self-administered, mailed surveys regarding their pre-test genetic counseling and results disclosure. No significant relationships were found between result disclosure method and the outcome variables investigated. A majority (90%) of individuals who received positive results by telephone returned for follow up visits. Factors which genetic counselors believed influenced their clinical decision to offer telephone disclosure, such as history of breast cancer, a priori risk of genetic mutation and family history of known mutation were not shown to significantly impact the actual disclosure method. This study suggests that telephone results disclosure is clinically appropriate when counselors utilize their clinical judgment to determine which patients are appropriate candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 212
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing
    Rice, Courtney Doughty
    Ruschman, Jennifer Gamm
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Manders, Jennifer B.
    Miller, Erin
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2010, 9 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [2] Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling
    Peshkin, Beth N.
    Kelly, Scott
    Nusbaum, Rachel H.
    Similuk, Morgan
    DeMarco, Tiffani A.
    Hooker, Gillian W.
    Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B.
    Forman, Andrea D.
    Joines, Jessica Rispoli
    Davis, Claire
    McCormick, Shelley R.
    McKinnon, Wendy
    Graves, Kristi D.
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Garber, Judy
    Wood, Marie
    Jandorf, Lina
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2016, 25 (03) : 472 - 482
  • [3] A systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone vs in-person genetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing
    Bracke, Xavier
    Roberts, Jonathan
    McVeigh, Terri P.
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2021, 30 (02) : 563 - 573
  • [4] Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling
    Jenkins, Jean
    Calzone, Kathleen A.
    Dimond, Eileen
    Liewehr, David J.
    Steinberg, Seth M.
    Jourkiv, Oxana
    Klein, Pam
    Soballe, Peter W.
    Prindiville, Sheila A.
    Kirsch, Ilan R.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 9 (08) : 487 - 495
  • [5] A randomized trial of telephone versus in-person disclosure of BRCA 1/2 results.
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    Patrick-Miller, Linda J.
    Egleston, Brian
    Smith, Kyle
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Forman, Andrea
    Bealin, Lisa
    Rybak, Christina
    Rainey, Kim
    Cherry, Carol
    Montgomery, Susan
    Daly, Mary Beryl
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [6] Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results? Opinions of recipients of BRCA1/2 testing.
    Patrick-Miller, L.
    Cummings, S.
    Fetzer, D.
    Schmidheiser, H.
    Bradbury, A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (02) : 186S - 186S
  • [7] Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results
    Patrick-Miller, Linda
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Daly, Mary
    Stevens, Evelyn
    Fetzer, Dominique
    Forman, Andrea
    Bealin, Lisa
    Rybak, Christina
    Peterson, Candace
    Corbman, Melanie
    Bradbury, Angela R.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 93 (03) : 413 - 419
  • [8] Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Delivery of BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling Compared With In-Person Counseling: 1-Year Follow-Up
    Kinney, Anita Y.
    Steffen, Laurie E.
    Brumbach, Barbara H.
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Du, Ruofei
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Gammon, Amanda
    Butler, Karin
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Stroup, Antoinette M.
    Campo, Rebecca A.
    Flores, Kristina G.
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (24) : 2914 - +
  • [9] Disparities in uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a randomized trial of telephone counseling
    Butrick, Morgan
    Kelly, Scott
    Peshkin, Beth N.
    Luta, George
    Nusbaum, Rachel
    Hooker, Gillian W.
    Graves, Kristi
    Feeley, Lisa
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B.
    Jandorf, Lina
    DeMarco, Tiffani
    Wood, Marie
    McKinnon, Wendy
    Garber, Judy
    McCormick, Shelley R.
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (06) : 467 - 475
  • [10] Disparities in Uptake of BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing in a Randomized Trial of Telephone Counseling
    Butrick, Morgan
    Kelly, Scott
    Peshkin, Beth N.
    Luta, George
    Nusbaum, Rachel
    Hooker, Gillian W.
    Graves, Kristi
    Feeley, Lisa
    Isaacs, Claudine
    Valdimarsdottir, Heiddis B.
    Jandorf, Lina
    DeMarco, Tiffani
    Wood, Marie
    McKinnon, Wendy
    Garber, Judy
    McCormick, Shelley R.
    Schwartz, Marc D.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (10) : 614 - 616