Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits

被引:0
|
作者
Jonas M. L. Moura
Juliana F. Ferreira
Leonardo Marques
Leandro Holgado
Carlos F. O. Graeff
Angela Kinoshita
机构
[1] Universidade Sagrado Coração,Faculdade de Ciências
[2] UNESP,undefined
关键词
Bone Tissue; PTFE; Bone Repair; Dipyrone; Fibrous Connective Tissue;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This work assessed the performance of membranes made of natural latex extracted from Hevea brasiliensis prepared with three different methods: polymerized immediately after collection without the use of ammonia (L1); polymerized after preservation in ammonia solution (L2); and polymerized after storage in ammonia, followed by Soxhlet technique for the extraction of substances (L3). Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane was used as control. Two 10-mm diameter bone defects were surgically made in the calvaria of thirty adult male New Zealand rabbits. Defects (total n = 60) were treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using L1, L2, L3 or PTFE membranes (n = 15 for each membrane). Ten animals were euthanized after 7, 20 and 60 days postoperatively so that five samples (n = 5) of each treatment were collected at each time, and bone regeneration was assessed microscopically. The microscopic analysis revealed defects filled with blood clot and new bone formation at the margins of the defect in all 7-day samples, while 20-day defects were mainly filled with fibrous connective tissue. After 60 days defects covered with L1 membranes showed a significantly larger bone formation area in comparison to the other groups (P < 0.05, ANOVA, Tukey). Additionally, bone tissue hypersensitization for L1 and PTFE membranes was also investigated in six additional rabbits. The animals were subjected to the same surgical procedure for the confection of one 10-mm diameter bone defect that was treated with L1 (n = 3) or PTFE (n = 3). Fifty-three days later, a second surgery was performed to make a second defect, which was treated with the same type of membrane used in the first surgery. Seven days later, the animals were euthanized and samples analyzed. No differences among L1 and PTFE samples collected from sensitized and non-sensitized animals were found (P > 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis). Therefore, the results demonstrated that latex membranes presented performance comparable to PTFE membranes, and that L1 membranes induced higher bone formation. L1 and PTFE membranes produced no hypersensitization in the bone tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:2111 / 2120
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits
    Moura, Jonas M. L.
    Ferreira, Juliana F.
    Marques, Leonardo
    Holgado, Leandro
    Graeff, Carlos F. O.
    Kinoshita, Angela
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 25 (09) : 2111 - 2120
  • [2] Natural Rubber Latex Used as Drug Delivery System in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)
    Herculano, Rondinelli Donizetti
    Silva, Cecilia Pereira
    Ereno, Cibele
    Catanzaro Guimaraes, Sergio Augusto
    Kinoshita, Angela
    de Oliveira Graeff, Carlos Frederico
    MATERIALS RESEARCH-IBERO-AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERIALS, 2009, 12 (02): : 253 - 256
  • [3] Evaluation of the efficacy of microporous versus macroporous PTFE membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) to an An Elderly Experimental Model
    Marouf, HA
    Al-Khateer, TL
    El-Guindi, HM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 78 (05) : 1152 - 1152
  • [4] Clinical Classification of Healing Complications and Management in Guided Bone Regeneration Procedures with a Nonresorbable d-PTFE Membrane
    Vroom, Melle G.
    Grundemann, Lodewijk J. M. M.
    Gallo, Pier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 42 (03) : 419 - 427
  • [5] Comparison of calcium alginate film with collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in mandibular defects in rabbits
    Huang, JQ
    He, H
    Sheng, LP
    Gu, GH
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (12) : 1449 - 1454
  • [6] Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Chen, Yumao
    Chen, Ming
    Gao, Yang
    Zhang, Feng
    Jin, Min
    Lu, Shijun
    Han, Minxuan
    ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (23): : 19979 - 19987
  • [7] Comparison of the Use of Two Different Silkworm-cocoon-derived Membrane for the Guided Bone Regeneration
    Park, Y. W.
    Kweon, H.
    Kim, S. G.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S350 - S350
  • [8] Comparison of Silkworm-Cocoon-Derived Silk Membranes of Two Different Thicknesses for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Seok, Hyun
    Kim, Min Keun
    Kim, Seong-Gon
    Kweon, HaeYong
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (06) : 2066 - 2069
  • [9] Comparison of ready-made and self-setting alginate membranes used as a barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration
    Ueyama, Y
    Koyama, T
    Ishikawa, K
    Mano, T
    Ogawa, Y
    Nagatsuka, H
    Suzuki, K
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 17 (03) : 281 - 288
  • [10] Comparison of ready-made and self-setting alginate membranes used as a barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration
    Yoshiya Ueyama
    Takahiro Koyama
    Kunio Ishikawa
    Takamitsu Mano
    Yukio Ogawa
    Hitoshi Nagatsuka
    Kazuomi Suzuki
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2006, 17 : 281 - 288