Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy–a Contemporary Review

被引:0
|
作者
Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
S. K. Raghunath
N. Srivatsa
C. Tejus
K. Vishruth
R. Anil Kumar
机构
[1] Trustwell Hospital,
[2] HCG Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
Radical prostatectomy; Potency; Continence; RALP; Laparoscopic prostatectomy.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prostatectomy has been widely accepted as a treatment option for prostate cancer and can be performed via an open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach. The outcomes following prostatectomy are primarily sub-grouped into oncological and functional outcomes. Oncological outcomes have been comparable in the above three surgical modalities. However, the robotic platform seems to have a better functional outcome compared to open prostatectomy. The data on the outcome of the laparoscopic approach is scarce and is not widely performed due to technical difficulty. With experience continence outcomes have reached a plateau in many robotic series, however, the potency outcome is the real Achilles tendon of this procedure. Many factors influence potency outcomes but the amount and quality of nerve-sparing is one factor that is under a surgeon’s control and it improves with experience.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 588
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy-a Contemporary Review
    Bhat, Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam
    Raghunath, S. K.
    Srivatsa, N.
    Tejus, C.
    Vishruth, K.
    Kumar, R. Anil
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (04) : 580 - 588
  • [2] Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Prasad, Michaella M.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Wang, Qin
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 4 - 5
  • [3] Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Hu, Jim C.
    Wang, Qin
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (14) : 2278 - 2284
  • [4] PREDICTORS OF THE CONTEMPORARY USE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Sandhu, Gurdarshan S.
    Strope, Seth A.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Owens, Pamela L.
    Tanagho, Youssef S.
    Kallogjeri, Dorina
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Nepple, Kenneth G.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E729 - E729
  • [5] Re: Utilization and Outcomes of Minimally invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Van Poppel, Hein
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (06) : 1439 - 1441
  • [6] Contemporary Management of Hemorrhage After Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy
    Dean, Lucas W.
    Tin, Amy L.
    Chesnut, Gregory T.
    Assel, Melissa
    LaDuke, Emily
    Fromkin, Jillian
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Touijer, Karim
    Eastham, James A.
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 130 : 120 - 125
  • [7] Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review
    Ashrafi, Akbar N.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (06) : 3112 - 3122
  • [8] Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy
    Humphreys, MR
    Gettman, MT
    Chow, GK
    Zincke, H
    Blute, ML
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 79 (09) : 1169 - 1180
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SURGEON VOLUME ON OUTCOMES
    Carvas, Fernando
    Choi, Wesley
    Prasad, Sandip
    Gu, Xiangmei
    Lipsitz, Stuart
    D'Amico, Anthony
    Yin, Lei
    Freire, Marcos
    Weinberg, Aaron
    Hu, Jim
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E285 - E285
  • [10] Contemporary Trends in Radical Prostatectomy in the United States: Open vs Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Menon, Mani
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 91 (01) : 1 - 2