Regulating Investment Robo-Advisors in China: Problems and Prospects

被引:0
|
作者
Li Guo
机构
[1] Peking University Law School,Professor of Law
关键词
Robo-advisor; Power of attorney; Fiduciary duty; Information disclosure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The robo-advisor excels at simplifying the process of making investments, improving its efficiency. Since its first appearance in the market, it has been welcomed by investors across the world. However, the current regulatory system in China is not only overly restrictive, but also unable to provide proper guidance to regulate securities investment advisors. The development of Chinese robo-advisor business faces various obstacles, such as high entry barriers, the inability to provide comprehensive wealth management services. These difficulties are due to prohibitions on granting securities advisors full power of attorney. The uncertain legal status of robo-advisors also creates issues with legitimacy. In addition, there is severe information asymmetry and a lack of investor protection in the operation of robo-advisors. These problems have impeded the development of the robo-advisor industry in China. In light of the approaches of the US and Australia in regulating robo-advisors, this paper suggests that China should consider an incremental approach that is tailored to domestic conditions to promote the growth of its robo-advisor industry. Recommended measures include: improving information disclosure requirements, refining the fiduciary duties of robo-advisors, and regulating the algorithms of robo-advisors. Regulatory sandbox may also be considered, as it could encourage the development of financial technology while mitigating the risks arising from the use of such technology.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 99
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regulating Investment Robo-Advisors in China: Problems and Prospects
    Guo, Li
    [J]. EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW, 2020, 21 (01) : 69 - 99
  • [3] Robo-advisors and investment intention: A perspective of value-based adoption
    Hong, Xianpei
    Pan, Liwei
    Gong, Yeming
    Chen, Qian
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 60 (06)
  • [4] Robo-Advisors and Wealth Management
    Phoon, Kokfai
    Koh, Francis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, 2018, 20 (03): : 79 - 94
  • [5] Anthropomorphized Financial Robo-advisors and Investment Advice-taking Behavior
    Deng, Bingjie
    Chau, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP (AMCIS 2021), 2021,
  • [6] Robo-advisors and the financialization of lay investors
    Tan, Gordon Kuo Siong
    [J]. GEOFORUM, 2020, 117 : 46 - 60
  • [7] Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review
    Cardillo, Giovanni
    Chiappini, Helen
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 62
  • [8] Robo-Advisors: A perspective on the Latin American context
    Mendez Prado, Silvia Mariela
    Quishpillo Pilco, Sandy Liliana
    Espin Parrales, Wellington S.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-COMMERCE, E-BUSINESS AND E-GOVERNMENT, ICEEG 2022, 2022, : 103 - 108
  • [9] Investors' willingness to use robo-advisors: Extrapolating influencing factors based on the fiduciary duty of investment advisors
    Luo, Haohan
    Liu, Xin
    Lv, Xingyang
    Hu, Yubei
    Ahmad, Ali J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 94
  • [10] Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?
    Brenner, Lukas
    Meyll, Tobias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2020, 25