Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1

被引:0
|
作者
Melanie Goldfarb
Steven Brower
S. D. Schwaitzberg
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Department of Surgery
[2] Memorial Health University Medical Center,undefined
[3] Cambridge Health Alliance,undefined
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2010年 / 24卷
关键词
Cancer; Immunologic consequences; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Perhaps there is no more important issue in the care of surgical patients than the appropriate use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with cancer. Important advances in surgical technique have an impact on early perioperative morbidity, length of hospital stay, pain management, and quality of life issues, as clearly proved with MIS. However, for oncology patients, historically, the most important clinical questions have been answered in the context of prospective randomized trials. Important considerations for MIS and cancer have been addressed, such as what are the important immunologic consequences of MIS versus open surgery and what is the role of laparoscopy in the staging of gastrointestinal cancers? This review article discusses many of the key controversies in the minimally invasive treatment of cancer using the pro–con debate format.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 334
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1
    Goldfarb, Melanie
    Brower, Steven
    Schwaitzberg, S. D.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (02): : 304 - 334
  • [2] Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer - benefits and controversies
    Wallner, Grzegorz
    Zgodzinski, Witold
    Masiak-Segit, Wioletta
    Skoczylas, Tomasz
    Dabrowski, Andrzej
    [J]. KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2014, 11 (02): : 151 - 155
  • [3] ADVANCES AND CONTROVERSIES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY Preface
    Gould, Jon
    Melvin, W. Scott
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 88 (05) : XV - XVI
  • [4] ADVANCES AND CONTROVERSIES IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY Foreword
    Martin, Ronald F.
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 88 (05) : XI - XIII
  • [5] Soft robotics in minimally invasive surgery (Part 1)
    Runciman, Mark
    Darzi, Ara
    Mylonas, George P.
    [J]. Galvanotechnik, 2020, 111 (07): : 1110 - 1112
  • [6] Guideline Summary: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Part 1
    不详
    [J]. AORN JOURNAL, 2017, 106 (01) : 60 - 64
  • [7] Guideline Implementation: Minimally Invasive Surgery, Part 1
    Wasielewski, Annette
    [J]. AORN JOURNAL, 2017, 106 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [8] Current Controversies and Advances in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery
    Kho, Kimberly A.
    [J]. CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (01) : 3 - 3
  • [9] Why minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer is minimally invasive?
    Hiki, Naoki
    [J]. ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2020, 4 (03): : 188 - 189
  • [10] Controversies and future of minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease
    Ezzedine, Walid
    Frontali, Alice
    Panis, Yves
    [J]. CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2020, 98 (09): : 503 - 506