Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Reflects Benefits Dependent on Individual Infection Status

被引:0
|
作者
Jade A. Ferguson
Tobin D. Northfield
Lori Lach
机构
[1] James Cook University,Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Science and Engineering
来源
Microbial Ecology | 2018年 / 76卷
关键词
Parasites; Pollen preference; Foraging behavior; Hive;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Parasites often modify host foraging behavior, for example, by spurring changes to nutrient intake ratios or triggering self-medication. The gut parasite, Nosema ceranae, increases energy needs of the European or Western honey bee (Apis mellifera), but little is known about how infection affects foraging behavior. We used a combination of experiments and observations of caged and free-flying individual bees and hives to determine how N. ceranae affects honey bee foraging behavior. In an experiment with caged bees, we found that infected bees with access to a high-quality pollen were more likely to survive than infected bees with access to a lower quality pollen or no pollen. Non-infected bees showed no difference in survival with pollen quality. We then tested free-flying bees in an arena of artificial flowers and found that pollen foraging bees chose pollen commensurate with their infection status; twice as many infected bees selected the higher quality pollen than the lower quality pollen, while healthy bees showed no preference between pollen types. However, healthy and infected bees visited sucrose and pollen flowers in the same proportions. Among hive-level observations, we found no significant correlations between N. ceranae infection intensity in the hive and the proportion of bees returning with pollen. Our results indicate that N. ceranae-infected bees benefit from increased pollen quality and will selectively forage for higher quality while foraging for pollen, but infection status does not lead to increased pollen foraging at either the individual or hive levels.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 491
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Pollen Foraging Reflects Benefits Dependent on Individual Infection Status
    Ferguson, Jade A.
    Northfield, Tobin D.
    Lach, Lori
    MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 76 (02) : 482 - 491
  • [2] Honey Bee, Apis mellifera, pollen foraging in southern Ontario
    Stimec, J
    ScottDupree, CD
    McAndrews, JH
    CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST, 1997, 111 (03): : 454 - 456
  • [3] Honey bee (Apis mellifera) strains differ in apple (Malus domestica) pollen foraging preference
    Dag, A
    Stern, RA
    Shafir, S
    JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [4] COLONY STATE AND REGULATION OF POLLEN FORAGING IN THE HONEY-BEE, APIS-MELLIFERA L
    FEWELL, JH
    WINSTON, ML
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (06) : 387 - 393
  • [5] Nosema apis infection in honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens
    Webster, Thomas C.
    Thacker, Etta M.
    Pomper, Kirk
    Lowe, Jeremiah
    Hunt, Greg
    JOURNAL OF APICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [6] Pollen foraging behaviour of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) in southern West Bengal, India
    Layek, Ujjwal
    Manna, Siddhartha S.
    Karmakar, Prakash
    PALYNOLOGY, 2020, 44 (01) : 114 - 126
  • [7] Analyzing pollen content to assess honey bee (Apis mellifera Linnaeus, 1758) foraging in an urban area
    Cunha, Jessica Morais
    Matos, Vanessa Ribeiro
    Carneiro, Lazaro da Silva
    Rodrigues, Rosana
    Sudre, Claudia Pombo
    Gaglianone, Maria Cristina
    ARTHROPOD-PLANT INTERACTIONS, 2025, 19 (02)
  • [8] Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    Pankiw, T
    Page, RE
    Fondrk, MK
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1998, 44 (03) : 193 - 198
  • [9] INDIVIDUAL FORAGING EFFORT AS A FUNCTION OF COLONY POPULATION IN THE HONEY-BEE, APIS-MELLIFERA L
    FEWELL, JH
    YDENBERG, RC
    WINSTON, ML
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1991, 42 : 153 - 155
  • [10] Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honey bees (Apis mellifera)
    Tanya Pankiw
    Robert E. Page Jr
    M. Kim Fondrk
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1998, 44 : 193 - 198