Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods

被引:0
|
作者
S. Casati
K. Aschberger
J. Barroso
W. Casey
I. Delgado
T. S. Kim
N. Kleinstreuer
H. Kojima
J. K. Lee
A. Lowit
H. K. Park
M. J. Régimbald-Krnel
J. Strickland
M. Whelan
Y. Yang
Valérie Zuang
机构
[1] Joint Research Centre (JRC),European Commission
[2] National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences,National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods
[3] Oswaldo Cruz Foundation,BraCVAM, National Institute of Quality Control in Health
[4] National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation,Korean Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods
[5] National Institute of Health Sciences,Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods
[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Office of Pesticide Programs
[7] Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau,Institute of Toxicology
[8] Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch,undefined
[9] Health Canada,undefined
[10] Integrated Laboratory Systems inc.,undefined
[11] Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,undefined
来源
Archives of Toxicology | 2018年 / 92卷
关键词
Skin sensitisation; Defined approaches; Alternative methods; International standards; Adverse outcome pathway;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Skin sensitisation is the regulatory endpoint that has been at the centre of concerted efforts to replace animal testing in recent years, as demonstrated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) adoption of five non-animal methods addressing mechanisms under the first three key events of the skin sensitisation adverse outcome pathway. Nevertheless, the currently adopted methods, when used in isolation, are not sufficient to fulfil regulatory requirements on the skin sensitisation potential and potency of chemicals comparable to that provided by the regulatory animal tests. For this reason, a number of defined approaches integrating data from these methods with other relevant information have been proposed and documented by the OECD. With the aim to further enhance regulatory consideration and adoption of defined approaches, the European Union Reference Laboratory for Alternatives to Animal testing in collaboration with the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods hosted, on 4–5 October 2016, a workshop on the international regulatory applicability and acceptance of alternative non-animal approaches, i.e., defined approaches, to skin sensitisation assessment of chemicals used in a variety of sectors. The workshop convened representatives from more than 20 regulatory authorities from the European Union, United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Brazil and China. There was a general consensus among the workshop participants that to maximise global regulatory acceptance of data generated with defined approaches, international harmonisation and standardisation are needed. Potential assessment criteria were defined for a systematic evaluation of existing defined approaches that would facilitate their translation into international standards, e.g., into a performance-based Test Guideline. Informed by the discussions at the workshop, the ICATM members propose practical ways to further promote the regulatory use and facilitate adoption of defined approaches for skin sensitisation assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods
    Casati, S.
    Aschberger, K.
    Barroso, J.
    Casey, W.
    Delgado, I.
    Kim, T. S.
    Kleinstreuer, N.
    Kojima, H.
    Lee, J. K.
    Lowit, A.
    Park, H. K.
    Regimbald-Krnel, M. J.
    Strickland, J.
    Whelan, M.
    Yang, Y.
    Zuang, Valerie
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 92 (02) : 611 - 617
  • [2] Standardisation and international adoption of defined approaches for skin sensitisation
    Casati, Silvia
    Asturiol, David
    Browne, Patience
    Kleinstreuer, Nicole
    Regimbald-Krnel, Michele
    Therriault, Pierre
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 4
  • [3] Progress in the validation and regulatory adoption of alternative approaches for skin sensitisation assessment
    Casati, Silvia
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S44 - S44
  • [4] Validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative test methods and international co-operation
    Wilcox, NL
    [J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVEN ZU TIEREXPERIMENTEN, 1999, 16 (03): : 163 - 166
  • [5] Alternative approaches for acute inhalation toxicity testing to address global regulatory and non-regulatory data requirements: An international workshop report
    Clippinger, Amy J.
    Allen, David
    Jarabek, Annie M.
    Corvaro, Marco
    Gaca, Marianna
    Gehen, Sean
    Hotchkiss, Jon A.
    Patlewicz, Grace
    Melbourne, Jodie
    Hinderliter, Paul
    Yoon, Miyoung
    Huh, Dongeun
    Lowit, Anna
    Buckley, Barbara
    Bartels, Michael
    BeruBe, Kelly
    Wilson, Daniel M.
    Indans, Ian
    Vinken, Mathieu
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2018, 48 : 53 - 70
  • [6] The International Workshop on Alternative Methods to Reduce, Refine, and Replace the Use of Animals in Vaccine Potency and Safety Testing: introduction and summary
    Stokes, William S.
    Kulpa-Eddy, Jodie
    McFarland, Richard
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO REDUCE, REFINE, AND REPLACE THE USE OF ANIMALS IN VACCINE POTENCY AND SAFETY TESTING: STATE OF THE SCIENCE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS, 2011, 5 : 1 - 15