Flexibility and Stringency in Greenhouse Gas Regulations

被引:0
|
作者
Dallas Burtraw
Matt Woerman
Alan Krupnick
机构
[1] Resources for the Future,
[2] University of California,undefined
来源
关键词
Climate policy; Efficiency; EPA; Clean Air Act ; Coal; Compliance flexibility; Regulation; Ancillary benefits; K32; Q54; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Clean Air Act provides the regulatory framework for climate policy in the United States. Emissions rate performance standards are the metric identified for regulation of the electricity sector, the most important source of emissions. Rates for existing sources could be averaged to achieve flexibility in compliance, although the stringency of policies is ambiguous when flexibility is introduced. For example, a specific emissions rate improvement averaged over a larger set of generators may reduce the actual emissions change. We evaluate three policy designs according to emissions rate, emissions and marginal cost and show how a marginal abatement cost criterion can be applied within a technology-based regulation. This approach can quadruple the emissions reductions that are achieved, with net social benefits exceeding $25 billion in 2020, and with a 1.3 % electricity price increase. Over half of the benefits stem from improvements in conventional air quality.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 248
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flexibility and Stringency in Greenhouse Gas Regulations
    Burtraw, Dallas
    Woerman, Matt
    Krupnick, Alan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 63 (02): : 225 - 248
  • [2] Measuring the Stringency of Environmental Regulations
    Brunel, Claire
    Levinson, Arik
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2016, 10 (01) : 47 - 67
  • [3] Greenhouse-gas regulations are coming to chemicals
    Arne, Michael
    Johnson, Eric
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 113 (13) : 15 - 17
  • [4] ACSAICHE 99089-Preparing for greenhouse gas regulations
    Johnson, Greg
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 235
  • [5] Trade in pollutive industries and the stringency of environmental regulations
    Busse, Matthias
    Silberberger, Magdalene
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 20 (04) : 320 - 323
  • [6] Explaining Unilateral Cooperative Actions: The Case of Greenhouse Gas Regulations
    Luterbacher, Urs
    Davis, Peter
    [J]. MONASH UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2010, 36 (01): : 121 - +
  • [7] The economics of "when" flexibility in the design of greenhouse gas abatement policies
    Toman, MA
    Morgenstern, RD
    Anderson, J
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 24 : 431 - 460
  • [8] Effects of urban land-use regulations on greenhouse gas emissions
    Leibowicz, Benjamin D.
    [J]. CITIES, 2017, 70 : 135 - 152
  • [9] Does Distribution Matter? Efficiency, Equity and Flexibility in Greenhouse Gas Abatement
    Gunter Stephan
    Georg Müller-Fürstenberger
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2004, 27 : 87 - 107
  • [10] Does distribution matter?: Efficiency, equity and flexibility in greenhouse gas abatement
    Stephan, G
    Müller-Fürstenberger, G
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2004, 27 (01): : 87 - 107