Using the good cop/bad cop profile with the MMPI-2

被引:2
|
作者
Brewster J.A. [1 ]
Stoloff M.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Psychology Department, James Madison University, 22807 Harrisonburg, VA
关键词
Police Officer; Police Department; Clinical Scale; Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; Criminal Psychology;
D O I
10.1007/BF02830066
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) has been widely used in a variety of ways to screen candidates for law enforcement positions. This study extends the use of the MMPI Good Cop/Bad Cop (GC/BC) profile (Blau, Super, & Brady, 1993) to the MMPI-2. The MMPI-2 profiles of 39 veteran police officers were used to predict their performance (No Apparent Problems, Borderline, or Serious Problems Possible), and these predictions were compared with supervisors' ratings of the officers' actual performance. The MMPI-2 predictions were accurate for 46% of the officers, a rate that was significantly better than chance (p=.024). Based on the current data, the best selection outcome would be obtained by accepting officers whose MMPI-2 profiles place them in the No Apparent Problems or Borderline groups, and rejecting officers whose profiles suggest Serious Problems Possible. This could be accomplished simply by rejecting any officer who obtained a score above 65T on any of the clinical scales. This selection strategy would have resulted in the acceptance of 22 officers, 19 of whom were highly rated by their supervisors, and the rejection of 17 officers, 11 of whom were rated as borderline or poorer by their supervisors. It would also result in the erroneous rejection of 6 officers who were highly rated by supervisors. © 1999 Society for Police and Criminal Psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Good COP or Bad COP?
    Mackey, Geoff
    [J]. SURFACE COATINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 104 (06): : 415 - 415
  • [2] GOOD COP BAD COP
    Earnest, Steve
    [J]. THEATRE JOURNAL, 2010, 62 (01) : 114 - 116
  • [3] Prostaglandins in bone: bad cop, good cop?
    Blackwell, Katherine A.
    Raisz, Lawrence G.
    Pilbeam, Carol C.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2010, 21 (05): : 294 - 301
  • [4] Good cop(per), bad cop(per)
    Cláudio Nunes-Alves
    [J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2015, 13 (1) : 3 - 3
  • [5] Good cop/bad cop supervisors harm productivity
    不详
    [J]. IIE SOLUTIONS, 2002, 34 (08): : 66 - 66
  • [6] p53: Good cop/bad cop
    Sharpless, NE
    DePinho, RA
    [J]. CELL, 2002, 110 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [7] TLRs play good cop, bad cop in the lung
    Luke A J O'Neill
    [J]. Nature Medicine, 2005, 11 : 1161 - 1162
  • [8] GPR40: Good Cop, Bad Cop?
    Alquier, Thierry
    Poitout, Vincent
    [J]. DIABETES, 2009, 58 (05) : 1035 - 1036
  • [9] TLRs play good cop, bad cop in the lung
    O'Neill, LAJ
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2005, 11 (11) : 1161 - 1162
  • [10] Good Cop, Bad Cop: The Different Roles of SRPKs
    Nikolakaki, Eleni
    Sigala, Ioanna
    Giannakouros, Thomas
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13