Mitral valve annuloplasty versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation

Although practice guidelines recommend surgery for patients with severe chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR), they do not specify whether to repair or replace the mitral valve. 436 consecutive patients with severe CIMR were eligible for inclusion in the study, of which 316 (72.5%) underwent mitral valve annuloplasty (MVA) whereas 120 (27.5%) received mitral valve replacement (MVR). At 59 months (interquartile range, 37–85 months) follow-up, though the left ventricle end-diastolic diameter was markedly larger (P = 0.019) in the MVA group than in the MVR group, no significant difference was observed in overall survival, freedom from cardiac death, or avoidance of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE). MVA provides better results in freedom from cardiac death in subgroups of age ≥65years and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≥50% (P = 0.014 and P = 0.016, respectively), whereas MVR was associated with a lower risk of MACCE in subgroups of age <65years, EF <50% and left ventricular inferior basal wall motion abnormality (BWMA) (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, MVR is a suitable management of patients with severe CIMR, and it is more favorable to ventricular remodeling. The choice of MVA or MVR should depend on major high-risk clinical factors.