From AI Ethics Principles to Practices: A Teleological Methodology to Apply AI Ethics Principles in The Defence Domain

被引:0
|
作者
Taddeo M. [1 ,2 ]
Blanchard A. [2 ]
Thomas C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford
[2] Alan Turing Institute, London
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Defence Domain; Ethics; Methodology; Military; Practices; Principles;
D O I
10.1007/s13347-024-00710-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article provides a methodology for the interpretation of AI ethics principles to specify ethical criteria for the development and deployment of AI systems in high-risk domains. The methodology consists of a three-step process deployed by an independent, multi-stakeholder ethics board to: (1) identify the appropriate level of abstraction for modelling the AI lifecycle; (2) interpret prescribed principles to extract specific requirements to be met at each step of the AI lifecycle; and (3) define the criteria to inform purpose- and context-specific balancing of the principles. The methodology presented in this article is designed to be agile, adaptable, and replicable, and when used as part of a pro-ethical institutional culture, will help to foster the ethical design, development, and deployment of AI systems. The application of the methodology is illustrated through reference to the UK Ministry of Defence AI ethics principles. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AI ethics: from principles to practice
    Zhou, Jianlong
    Chen, Fang
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 (06) : 2693 - 2703
  • [2] AI ethics: from principles to practice
    Jianlong Zhou
    Fang Chen
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2023, 38 : 2693 - 2703
  • [3] Operationalizing AI Ethics Principles
    Canca, Cansu
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2020, 63 (12) : 18 - 21
  • [4] Reconstructing AI Ethics Principles: Rawlsian Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
    Westerstrand, Salla
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2024, 30 (05)
  • [5] Ethics in human–AI teaming: principles and perspectives
    Michael Pflanzer
    Zachary Traylor
    Joseph B. Lyons
    Veljko Dubljević
    Chang S. Nam
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2023, 3 (3): : 917 - 935
  • [6] Lessons learned from AI ethics principles for future actions
    Merve Hickok
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2021, 1 (1): : 41 - 47
  • [7] Machine learning modeling practices to support the principles of AI and ethics in nutrition research
    Diana M. Thomas
    Samantha Kleinberg
    Andrew W. Brown
    Mason Crow
    Nathaniel D. Bastian
    Nicholas Reisweber
    Robert Lasater
    Thomas Kendall
    Patrick Shafto
    Raymond Blaine
    Sarah Smith
    Daniel Ruiz
    Christopher Morrell
    Nicholas Clark
    [J]. Nutrition & Diabetes, 12
  • [8] Machine learning modeling practices to support the principles of AI and ethics in nutrition research
    Thomas, Diana M.
    Kleinberg, Samantha
    Brown, Andrew W.
    Crow, Mason
    Bastian, Nathaniel D.
    Reisweber, Nicholas
    Lasater, Robert
    Kendall, Thomas
    Shafto, Patrick
    Blaine, Raymond
    Smith, Sarah
    Ruiz, Daniel
    Morrell, Christopher
    Clark, Nicholas
    [J]. NUTRITION & DIABETES, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [9] A Study on the Modeling of Major Factors for the Principles of AI Ethics
    Lim, Ji Hun
    Kwon, Hun Yeong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2021, 2021, : 208 - 218
  • [10] The Ethics of Relational AI - Expanding and Implementing the Belmont Principles
    Sim, Ida
    Cassel, Christine
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2024, 391 (03): : 193 - 196