“Glorecalization” of ECEC curriculum guidelines: a comparative study of China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan

In the global world, globalization influences education worldwide; therefore, the dynamics between local and global, termed “glocalization,” is crucial to curriculum guidelines that officially represent an ideal education. The latest Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) curriculum was announced during the 2012–2017 period in China, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan. Following Bereday’s four-step comparison method, this article systematically compares four guidelines and, referring to their socio-historical backgrounds, examines how global trends, Chinese culture, and local context interactively influence their ECEC guidelines. Within the Chinese context, this study coins a new concept of “glo-re-calization “ based on glocalization and regionalization by which we examine how global trends, regional culture, and local forces co-contribute to the sameness and differences in four curriculum guidelines. Based on the four guidelines analysis, we propose the Glorecal Power Model with four patterns. A “logloblization” is a model that overwhelmingly weighs a local force, seen as a regional force, as in the case of China pursuing loglobalization towards regionalization. A “GloRecalization” model weighs global and regional forces much more than the local ones, as in the case of Hong Kong, which is rushing towards globalization and regionalization. A “gloreCalization” model considers mainly local force, as in the case of Macau, which calls for localization. A “Glorecalization” model takes place where global trends are the most significant feature among the three powers as in the case of Taiwan walking on global trends. © 2023, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Australian Curriculum Studies Association.