Is It Wraparound Yet? Setting Quality Standards for Implementation of the Wraparound Process

被引:0
|
作者
Eric J. Bruns
Jesse C. Suter
Kristen Leverentz-Brady
机构
[1] University of Washington School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Division of Public Behavioral Health and Justice Policy
[2] University of Vermont,Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
[3] University of Vermont,Department of Psychology
关键词
fidelity; standards; implementation; wraparound; children; youth;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The wraparound process has increasingly been used as a mechanism to plan and coordinate services for children with behavioral health needs and their families. This has led to growing interest in assessing wraparound implementation against standards for quality. However, there has been little consideration of how best to establish such benchmarks or guidelines. Using both a norm-referenced and criterion-referenced approach, this study established preliminary criteria for assessing the adequacy of wraparound implementation using the Wraparound Fidelity Index, version 3, a multi-informant interview that assesses conformance to wraparound principles. The evaluation system was then applied to ten wraparound programs and 11 different study samples assessed via the Wraparound Fidelity Index version 3 in research studies. The system was constructed to discriminate different wraparound conditions assessed in research studies while still being attainable by the ten established wraparound programs. Implications for evaluating wraparound programs and for setting fidelity benchmarks in behavioral health services research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is it wraparound yet? Setting quality standards for implementation of the wraparound process
    Bruns, Eric J.
    Suter, Jesse C.
    Leverentz-Brady, Kristen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (03): : 240 - 252
  • [2] Wraparound Structured Assessment and Review (WrapSTAR): An efficient, yet comprehensive approach to Wraparound implementation evaluation
    Coldiron, Jennifer Schurer
    Bruns, Eric J.
    Hook, Alyssa N.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [3] The Community Supports for Wraparound Inventory: An Assessment of the Implementation Context for Wraparound
    Walker, Janet S.
    Sanders, Becca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2011, 20 (06) : 747 - 757
  • [4] The Community Supports for Wraparound Inventory: An Assessment of the Implementation Context for Wraparound
    Janet S. Walker
    Becca Sanders
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2011, 20 : 747 - 757
  • [5] Research on the Wraparound Process: Intervention Components and Implementation Supports
    Bruns, Eric J.
    Walker, Janet S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2011, 20 (06) : 709 - 712
  • [6] Reliability of the wraparound observation form: An instrument to measure the wraparound process
    Epstein M.H.
    Jayanthi M.
    McKelvey J.
    Frankenberry E.
    Hardy R.
    Dennis K.
    Dennis K.
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1998, 7 (2) : 161 - 170
  • [7] Research on the Wraparound Process: Intervention Components and Implementation Supports
    Eric J. Bruns
    Janet S. Walker
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2011, 20 : 709 - 712
  • [8] Who administers wraparound? An examination of the training, beliefs, and implementation supports for wraparound providers
    Bruns, Eric J.
    Walrath, Christine M.
    Sheehan, Angela K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2007, 15 (03) : 156 - 168
  • [9] Practice and process in wraparound teamwork
    Walker, JS
    Schutte, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2004, 12 (03) : 182 - 192
  • [10] Quality and individualization in wraparound team planning
    Walker J.S.
    Schutte K.
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2005, 14 (2) : 251 - 267