共 50 条
A randomized trial of a mobile health intervention to augment cardiac rehabilitation
被引:0
|作者:
Jessica R. Golbus
Kashvi Gupta
Rachel Stevens
V.Swetha E. Jeganathan
Evan Luff
Jieru Shi
Walter Dempsey
Thomas Boyden
Bhramar Mukherjee
Sarah Kohnstamm
Vlad Taralunga
Vik Kheterpal
Susan Murphy
Predrag Klasnja
Sachin Kheterpal
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
机构:
[1] University of Michigan,Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine
[2] University of Michigan,Michigan Integrated Center for Health Analytics and Medical Prediction (MiCHAMP)
[3] University of Missouri Kansas City,Department of Internal Medicine
[4] University of Michigan School of Public Health,Department of Biostatistics
[5] Spectrum Health,Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine
[6] University of Michigan,School of Public Health
[7] CareEvolution,Departments of Statistics & Computer Science
[8] Harvard University,School of Information
[9] University of Michigan,Department of Anesthesiology
[10] University of Michigan,The Center for Clinical Management and Research
[11] Ann Arbor VA Medical Center,undefined
来源:
关键词:
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may enhance positive health behaviors, but randomized trials evaluating their efficacy are uncommon. Our goal was to determine if a mHealth intervention augmented and extended benefits of center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for physical activity levels at 6-months. We delivered a randomized clinical trial to low and moderate risk patients with a compatible smartphone enrolled in CR at two health systems. All participants received a compatible smartwatch and usual CR care. Intervention participants received a mHealth intervention that included a just-in-time-adaptive intervention (JITAI) as text messages. The primary outcome was change in remote 6-minute walk distance at 6-months stratified by device type. Here we report the results for 220 participants enrolled in the study (mean [SD]: age 59.6 [10.6] years; 67 [30.5%] women). For our primary outcome at 6 months, there is no significant difference in the change in 6 min walk distance across smartwatch types (Intervention versus control: +31.1 meters Apple Watch, −7.4 meters Fitbit; p = 0.28). Secondary outcomes show no difference in mean step counts between the first and final weeks of the study, but a change in 6 min walk distance at 3 months for Fitbit users. Amongst patients enrolled in center-based CR, a mHealth intervention did not improve 6-month outcomes but suggested differences at 3 months in some users.
引用
收藏
相关论文