Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests

被引:0
|
作者
Andreas Osterman
Irina Badell
Elif Basara
Marcel Stern
Fabian Kriesel
Marwa Eletreby
Gamze Naz Öztan
Melanie Huber
Hanna Autenrieth
Ricarda Knabe
Patricia M. Späth
Maximilian Muenchhoff
Alexander Graf
Stefan Krebs
Helmut Blum
Jürgen Durner
Ludwig Czibere
Christopher Dächert
Lars Kaderali
Hanna-Mari Baldauf
Oliver T. Keppler
机构
[1] LMU München,Max Von Pettenkofer Institute and Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses
[2] German Center for Infection Research (DZIF),COVID
[3] Partner Site,19 Registry of the LMU Munich (CORKUM)
[4] University Hospital,Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center
[5] LMU Munich,Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology
[6] LMU München,Institute of Bioinformatics
[7] Labor Becker MVZ GbR,undefined
[8] University Hospital,undefined
[9] LMU München,undefined
[10] University Medicine Greifswald,undefined
来源
关键词
SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test; Nucleocapsid protein; Diagnostic test; Sensitivity; Specificity; VoC; Lateral flow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since autumn 2020, rapid antigen tests (RATs) have been implemented in several countries as an important pillar of the national testing strategy to rapidly screen for infections on site during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The current surge in infection rates around the globe is driven by the variant of concern (VoC) omicron (B.1.1.529). Here, we evaluated the performance of nine SARS-CoV-2 RATs in a single-centre laboratory study. We examined a total of 115 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative and 166 SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive respiratory swab samples (101 omicron, 65 delta (B.1.617.2)) collected from October 2021 until January 2022 as well as cell culture-expanded clinical isolates of both VoCs. In an assessment of the analytical sensitivity in clinical specimen, the 50% limit of detection (LoD50) ranged from 1.77 × 106 to 7.03 × 107 RNA copies subjected to the RAT for omicron compared to 1.32 × 105 to 2.05 × 106 for delta. To score positive in these point-of-care tests, up to 10-fold (LoD50) or 101-fold (LoD95) higher virus loads were required for omicron- compared to delta-containing samples. The rates of true positive test results for omicron samples in the highest virus load category (Ct values < 25) ranged between 31.4 and 77.8%, while they dropped to 0–8.3% for samples with intermediate Ct values (25–30). Of note, testing of expanded virus stocks suggested a comparable RAT sensitivity of both VoCs, questioning the predictive value of this type of in vitro-studies for clinical performance. Given their importance for national test strategies in the current omicron wave, awareness must be increased for the reduced detection rate of omicron infections by RATs and a short list of suitable RATs that fulfill the minimal requirements of performance should be rapidly disclosed.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests
    Osterman, Andreas
    Badell, Irina
    Basara, Elif
    Stern, Marcel
    Kriesel, Fabian
    Eletreby, Marwa
    Oztan, Gamze Naz
    Huber, Melanie
    Autenrieth, Hanna
    Knabe, Ricarda
    Spath, Patricia M.
    Muenchhoff, Maximilian
    Graf, Alexander
    Krebs, Stefan
    Blum, Helmut
    Durner, Jurgen
    Czibere, Ludwig
    Dachert, Christopher
    Kaderali, Lars
    Baldauf, Hanna-Mari
    Keppler, Oliver T.
    MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 211 (2-3) : 105 - 117
  • [2] Sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2
    Sakai-Tagawa, Yuko
    Yamayoshi, Seiya
    Halfmann, Peter J.
    Wilson, Nancy
    Bobholz, Max
    Vuyk, William C.
    Wei, Wanting
    Ries, Hunter
    O'Connor, David H.
    Friedrich, Thomas C.
    Sordillo, Emilia M.
    van Bakel, Harm
    Simon, Viviana
    Kawaoka, Yoshihiro
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2023, 95 (05)
  • [3] SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests
    Fouzas, Sotirios
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (08): : 1068 - 1069
  • [4] Rapid antigen detection tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Liu, Michael
    Arora, Rahul K.
    Krajden, Mel
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 193 (23) : E886 - E887
  • [5] SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection by antigen tests using saliva
    Murakami, Kaoru
    Iwasaki, Sumio
    Oguri, Satoshi
    Tanaka, Kumiko
    Suzuki, Rigel
    Hayasaka, Kasumi
    Fujisawa, Shinichi
    Watanabe, Chiaki
    Konno, Satoshi
    Yokota, Isao
    Fukuhara, Takasuke
    Murakami, Masaaki
    Teshima, Takanori
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY PLUS, 2022, 2 (04):
  • [6] Rapid antigen tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2: A comment
    Sookaromdee, Pathum
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    ATENCION PRIMARIA, 2022, 54 (02):
  • [7] SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests Reply
    Peeling, Rosanna W.
    Olliaro, Piero
    Boeras, Debrah
    Fongwen, Noah
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (08): : 1069 - 1070
  • [8] A Comparison Study of the Detection Limit of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid by Various Rapid Antigen Tests
    Dobrynin, Daniela
    Polischuk, Iryna
    Pokroy, Boaz
    BIOSENSORS-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [9] SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests For reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection not suitable
    Reuter, Tom
    Lange, Constanze
    Zeyher, Sharay
    Woelk, Benno
    Kramer, Jan
    PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG, 2023, 18 (03): : 370 - 376
  • [10] Rapid Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Bezerra, Matheus Filgueira
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (19): : 1925 - 1926