Three-Dimensional Finite Element Based Numerical Simulation of Machining of Thin-Wall Components with Varying Wall Constraints

被引:16
|
作者
Joshi S.N. [1 ]
Bolar G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, 781 039, Assam
关键词
Aluminum; 2024-T351; Deflection; Deformation; End milling; Finite element method; Numerical simulation; Thin-wall machining;
D O I
10.1007/s40032-016-0246-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Control of part deflection and deformation during machining of low rigidity thin-wall components is an important aspect in the manufacture of desired quality products. This paper presents a comparative study on the effect of geometry constraints on the product quality during machining of thin-wall components made of an aerospace alloy aluminum 2024-T351. Three-dimensional nonlinear finite element (FE) based simulations of machining of thin-wall parts were carried out by considering three variations in the wall constraint viz. free wall, wall constrained at one end, and wall with constraints at both the ends. Lagrangian formulation based transient FE model has been developed to simulate the interaction between the workpiece and helical milling cutter. Johnson–Cook material and damage model were adopted to account for material behavior during machining process; damage initiation and chip separation. A modified Coulomb friction model was employed to define the contact between the cutting tool and the workpiece. The numerical model was validated with experimental results and found to be in good agreement. Based on the simulation results it was noted that deflection and deformation were maximum in the thin-wall constrained at one end in comparison with those obtained in other cases. It was noted that three dimensional finite element simulations help in a better way to predict the product quality during precision manufacturing of thin-wall components. © 2016, The Institution of Engineers (India).
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 352
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Finite element analysis of machining thin-wall parts
    Izamshah R.A.R.
    Mo J.P.T.
    Ding S.
    Key Engineering Materials, 2011, 458 : 283 - 288
  • [2] Three-dimensional numerical modeling, simulation and experimental validation of milling of a thin-wall component
    Bolar, Gururaj
    Joshi, Shrikrishna N.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2017, 231 (05) : 792 - 804
  • [3] Finite element simulation of the axial collapse of thin-wall square frusta
    Mamalis, AG
    Manolakos, DE
    Ioannidis, MB
    Kostazos, PK
    Hassiotis, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS, 2001, 6 (02) : 155 - 164
  • [4] Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Thin-WallInjection Molding Flow Based on Wall Slip
    Liu H.
    Jiang Q.
    Wang D.
    Lai J.
    Huang X.
    Gaofenzi Cailiao Kexue Yu Gongcheng/Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 34 (06): : 122 - 126
  • [5] Design and finite element analysis of the assemble tooling system for aircraft thin-wall components
    Chen, Yanhai
    Han, Xiaoguang
    Yang, Yeguang
    Li, Yuzhu
    PRODUCT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, 2011, 338 : 189 - +
  • [6] Numerical Simulation of a Three-Dimensional Wall Separation.
    Billet, Germain
    Recherche aerospatiale, 1980, (197): : 229 - 240
  • [7] Applications of FEM in simulation of thin-wall part machining process
    Tan, Biao
    Fan, Bingyan
    Hangkong Gongyi Jishu/Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 1997, (01): : 30 - 32
  • [8] Finite element analysis of deformation of the multipoint flexible clamped thin-wall component during machining
    Cao, Guoqiang
    Sun, Yiyu
    AUTOMATIC MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 542-543 : 519 - 522
  • [9] Three-dimensional finite element analysis of shear wall buildings
    Oztorun, NK
    Citipitioglu, E
    Akkas, N
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1998, 68 (1-3) : 41 - 55
  • [10] Hybrid deflection prediction on machining thin-wall monolithic aerospace components
    Izamshah, R.
    Mo, J. P. T.
    Ding, S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE, 2012, 226 (B4) : 592 - 605