Global leaf trait estimates biased due to plasticity in the shade

被引:0
|
作者
Trevor F. Keenan
Ülo Niinemets
机构
[1] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
[2] Estonian University of Life Sciences,undefined
[3] Kreutzwaldi 1,undefined
[4] 51014 Tartu,undefined
[5] Estonian Academy of Sciences,undefined
[6] Kohtu 6,undefined
[7] 10130 Tallinn,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The study of leaf functional trait relationships, the so-called leaf economics spectrum1,2, is based on the assumption of high-light conditions (as experienced by sunlit leaves). Owing to the exponential decrease of light availability through canopies, however, the vast majority of the world's vegetation exists in at least partial shade. Plant functional traits vary in direct dependence of light availability3, with different traits varying to different degrees, sometimes in conflict with expectations from the economic spectrum3. This means that the derived trait relationships of the global leaf economic spectrum are probably dependent on the extent to which observed data in existing large-scale plant databases represent high-light conditions. Here, using an extensive worldwide database of within-canopy gradients of key physiological, structural and chemical traits3, along with three different global trait databases4,5, we show that: (1) accounting for light-driven trait plasticity can reveal novel trait relationships, particularly for highly plastic traits (for example, the relationship between net assimilation rate per area (Aa) and leaf mass per area (LMA)); and (2) a large proportion of leaf traits in current global plant databases reported as measured in full sun were probably measured in the shade. The results show that even though the majority of leaves exist in the shade, along with a large proportion of observations, our current understanding is too focused on conditions in the sun.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global leaf trait estimates biased due to plasticity in the shade
    Keenan, Trevor F.
    Niinemets, Uelo
    NATURE PLANTS, 2017, 3 (01)
  • [2] Biased probability estimates in trait anxiety and trait depression are unrelated to biased availability
    Booth, Robert W.
    Sharma, Dinkar
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 73 : 101672
  • [3] SUN AND SHADE EFFECTS ON THE LEAF OF GUAREA (MELIACEAE) - PLASTICITY OF A BRANCH ANALOG
    FISHER, JB
    BOTANICAL GAZETTE, 1986, 147 (01): : 84 - 89
  • [4] Stronger plasticity of leaf characteristics is associated with better shade adaptation in Calycanthaceae
    Chao Zhang
    Jianxin Fu
    Bin Dong
    Lihua Zhou
    Hongbo Zhao
    Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2020, 61 : 959 - 969
  • [5] Stronger plasticity of leaf characteristics is associated with better shade adaptation in Calycanthaceae
    Zhang, Chao
    Fu, Jianxin
    Dong, Bin
    Zhou, Lihua
    Zhao, Hongbo
    HORTICULTURE ENVIRONMENT AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 61 (06) : 959 - 969
  • [6] BIASED FOREST STAND ESTIMATES DUE TO SAMPLE SIZE
    SHANKS, RE
    SCIENCE, 1953, 118 (3077) : 750 - 751
  • [7] Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Huang, Heng
    Wang, Han
    Penuelas, Josep
    Sardans, Jordi
    Niinemets, Ulo
    Niklas, Karl J.
    Li, Yan
    Xie, Jiangbo
    Wright, Ian J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [8] Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships
    Zhiqiang Wang
    Heng Huang
    Han Wang
    Josep Peñuelas
    Jordi Sardans
    Ülo Niinemets
    Karl J. Niklas
    Yan Li
    Jiangbo Xie
    Ian J. Wright
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [9] Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships
    Wright, IJ
    Reich, PB
    Cornelissen, JHC
    Falster, DS
    Garnier, E
    Hikosaka, K
    Lamont, BB
    Lee, W
    Oleksyn, J
    Osada, N
    Poorter, H
    Villar, R
    Warton, DI
    Westoby, M
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2005, 166 (02) : 485 - 496
  • [10] LEAF TRAIT PLASTICITY AND EVOLUTION IN DIFFERENT PLANT FUNCTIONAL TYPES
    Niinemets, Ulo
    ANNUAL PLANT REVIEWS ONLINE, 2020, 3 (04): : 473 - 521