Reliability and validity of Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale Turkish version

被引:0
|
作者
Mehmet Emin Demirkol
Hüseyin Güleç
Lut Tamam
Medine Yazıcı Güleç
Sertaç Alay Öztürk
Kerim Uğur
Mahmut Onur Karaytuğ
Meliha Zengin Eroğlu
机构
[1] Çukurova University Hospital,Department of Psychiatry
[2] Erenköy Hospital for Mental and Nervous Diseases,Department of Psychiatry
[3] Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi,Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı
[4] Malatya Training and Research Hospital,Department of Psychiatry
[5] Dr Ekrem Tok Hospital for Mental and Nervous Diseases,Department of Psychiatry
[6] Haydarpaşa Training and Research Hospital,Department of Psychiatry
来源
Current Psychology | 2020年 / 39卷
关键词
Suicide; Acute period; Psychological pain; Depression; Bipolar disorder; Diagnostic validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Mee Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (MBPPAS), which questions the frequency, intensity and acute period of psychological pain. We also aimed to investigate whether psychological pain allows measuring acute suicidal behavior; and whether there were different levels of psychological pain in suicide-related disorders. The study included 73 patients with major depressive disorder, 50 patients with bipolar disorder and 77 healthy controls. MBPPAS, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, Beck Hopelessness Scale, Physical Pain Scale, and Psychache Scale were filled by the participants. In the internal consistency, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was found to be 0.95 and the item-total score correlation coefficients were between 0.51 and 0.89. Explanatory factor analysis showed that the scale was loaded under the single factor, which had an eigenvalue of 7.02, explaining 70.23% of the total variance. Factor loads of the items were found between 0.57 and 0.92. Discriminant function analysis showed that the scale classified the patient group and the healthy group, also the patients with and without suicide attempt, and each group was classified as successfully when the three groups were considered together. Besides the fact that the Turkish version of the scale is valid and reliable, it has been shown that it can be useful (partially) in the studies conducted with patients in the acute phase and in distinguishing disorders from each other in suicide-related entities such as mood disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1188
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale Turkish version
    Demirkol, Mehmet Emin
    Gulec, Huseyin
    Tamam, Lut
    Gulec, Medine Yazici
    Ozturk, Sertac Alay
    Ugur, Kerim
    Karaytug, Mahmut Onur
    Eroglu, Meliha Zengin
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 39 (04) : 1181 - 1188
  • [2] Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Burden Assessment Scale
    Aydemir, Omer
    Dikici, Didem Suculluoglu
    Akdeniz, Fatma
    Kalayci, Fatma
    [J]. NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2012, 49 (04): : 276 - 280
  • [3] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Recovery Assessment Scale
    Guler, Cansu
    Gurkan, Ayca
    [J]. DUSUNEN ADAM-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (04): : 309 - 319
  • [4] Validity and reliability study for the Turkish version of global pain scale
    Aktas, Hasan
    Uyar, Meltem
    Korhan, Esra Akin
    Yildrim, Yasemin Kuzeyli
    Eyigor, Can
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 69 (09) : 1246 - 1252
  • [5] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the psychological preparedness for disaster threat scale
    Ceren Türkdoğan Görgün
    İlknur Koçak Şen
    Jim McLennan
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2023, 118 : 331 - 346
  • [6] The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Constipation Risk Assessment Scale
    Kutlu, Adalet Koca
    Yilmaz, Emel
    Cecen, Dilek
    Eser, Erhan
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2011, 34 (03) : 200 - 208
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF HEARTLAND FORGIVENESS SCALE
    Bugay, Asli
    Demir, Ayhan
    Delevi, Raquel
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2012, 111 (02) : 575 - 584
  • [8] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the psychological preparedness for disaster threat scale
    Gorgun, Ceren Turkdogan
    Sen, Ilknur Kocak
    McLennan, Jim
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2023, 118 (01) : 331 - 346
  • [9] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Mahony Psychological Assessment for Bariatric Surgery
    Oguz, Gulay
    Batmaz, Sedat
    Ugurlu, Tugce Toker
    Karabekiroglu, Aytul
    Al, Muzaffer
    Mert, Alper
    Birsen, Onur
    Ay, Ayinzeliha Matsar
    Eles, Vedat
    Ulker, Begum Derici
    Varma, Gulfizar Sozeri
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 331 - 343
  • [10] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE PAIN QUALITY ASSESSMENT SCALE IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME
    Sahin, Nilay
    Bodur, Said
    Salli, Ali
    Ugurlu, Hatice
    [J]. NOBEL MEDICUS, 2010, 6 (01): : 26 - 33