Schedule-dependent interaction between Doxorubicin and mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy in murine hepatoma in vitro and in vivo

被引:0
|
作者
V. Kirveliene
G. Grazeliene
D. Dabkeviciene
I. Micke
D. Kirvelis
B. Juodka
J. Didziapetriene
机构
[1] Vilnius University,Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics
[2] Vilnius University,Institute of Oncology
来源
关键词
Photodynamic therapy; Combination therapy; Doxorubicin mTHPC; Foscan;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate cytotoxic and antitumor effects of a conventional anticancer drug Doxorubicin (Dox) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) mediated by a promising photosensitizer of second generation meta-tetra (3-hydroxyphenyl)-chlorin (mTHPC) in combination. Methods: Murine hepatoma MH-22A was used for investigation in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, the cells were incubated with 0.15 μg/ml mTHPC for 18 h and exposed to light from LED array (λ= 660±20 nm) at 0.6–2.4 kJ/m2. 0.05–0.2 μg/ml Dox was administered either 24 h prior to or immediately after light exposure (Dox→PDT or PDT + Dox, respectively). The cytotoxicity was tested by staining with crystal violet. The character of the combined effect was assessed by multiple regression analysis. In vivo, the antitumor activity was estimated by monitoring the tumor volume over time, in mice transplanted subcutaneously with MH-22A and treated with Dox and/or PDT. For PDT, mice were exposed to light from diode laser (λ=650±2 nm) at 12 kJ/m2 following 24 h after administration of 0.15 mg/kg mTHPC. A 3 mg/kg Dox was administered either within 15 min prior to mTHPC or within 15 min after light exposure (Dox→PDT or PDT + Dox, respectively). Results: Both in vitro and in vivo, the combination of mTHPC-mediated PDT and Dox was evaluated to be more effective than each treatment alone. In vitro, the difference between cell viability curves after photodynamic treatment as a single modality and after combination of photodynamic treatment with Dox was statistically significant under most of the applied conditions (P≤0.02). In the case of PDT + Dox, the combination had an additive character, and the sequence Dox→PDT caused a sub-additive interaction. In vivo, both regimens of combination were more effective in inhibiting tumor growth than any single treatment (P<0.09). The antitumor activity of PDT + Dox regimen was more prominent than that of Dox→PDT; however, significance of the difference was not high (P=0.08). Conclusions: These results indicate that Dox potentiates therapeutic efficacy of mTHPC-mediated PDT and vice versa, and the degree of potentiation is influenced by the combination schedule: administration of Dox immediately after light exposure is preferable to administration of Dox at 24 h prior to light exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Schedule-dependent interaction between Doxorubicin and mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy in murine hepatoma in vitro and in vivo
    Kirveliene, V
    Grazeliene, G
    Dabkeviciene, D
    Micke, I
    Kirvelis, D
    Juodka, B
    Didziapetriene, J
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 57 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [2] mTHPC-mediated photodynamic treatment of Lewis lung carcinoma in vitro and in vivo
    Dabkeviciene, Daiva
    Stankevicius, Vaidotas
    Grazeliene, Grazina
    Markuckas, Arvydas
    Didziapetriene, Janina
    Kirveliene, Vida
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2010, 46 (05): : 345 - 350
  • [3] Schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and doxorubicin in human cancer cell lines in vitro
    Akutsu, M
    Kano, Y
    Tsunoda, S
    Suzuki, K
    Yazawa, Y
    Miura, Y
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (13-14) : 2341 - 2346
  • [4] Correlation of in vivo tumor response and singlet oxygen luminescence detection in mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy
    Wilson, Brian C.
    Patterson, Michael S.
    Li, Buhong
    Jarvi, Mark T.
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE OPTICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2015, 8 (01)
  • [5] Peripheral neural cell sensitivity to mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy in a 3D in vitro model
    Wright, K. E.
    Liniker, E.
    Loizidou, M.
    Moore, C.
    MacRobert, A. J.
    Phillips, J. B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (04) : 658 - 665
  • [6] Peripheral neural cell sensitivity to mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy in a 3D in vitro model
    K E Wright
    E Liniker
    M Loizidou
    C Moore
    A J MacRobert
    J B Phillips
    British Journal of Cancer, 2009, 101 : 658 - 665
  • [7] In vitro schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in human cancer cell lines
    Tanaka, R
    Ariyama, H
    Qin, BL
    Takii, Y
    Baba, E
    Mitsugi, K
    Harada, M
    Nakano, S
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 55 (06) : 595 - 601
  • [8] In vitro schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and oxaliplatin in human cancer cell lines
    Risa Tanaka
    Hiroshi Ariyama
    Baoli Qin
    Yasushi Takii
    Eishi Baba
    Kenji Mitsugi
    Mine Harada
    Shuji Nakano
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2005, 55 : 595 - 601
  • [9] Schedule-dependent cytotoxic interaction between epidoxorubicin and gemcitabine in human bladder cancer cells in vitro
    Zoli, W
    Ricotti, L
    Tesei, A
    Ulivi, P
    Campani, AG
    Fabbri, F
    Gunelli, R
    Frassineti, GL
    Amadori, D
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (04) : 1500 - 1507
  • [10] In Vitro Schedule-Dependent Interaction Between Melphalan and Oxaliplatin in Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines
    van Iersel, Liselot B. J.
    Koudijs, Tamara M.
    Hoekman, Ellen J.
    Janssen-van Rhijn, Connie M.
    Vahrmeijer, Alexander L.
    Nortier, Johan W. R.
    van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Gelderblom, Hans
    Kuppen, Peter J. K.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 167 (02) : 273 - 278