Comparisons Between Numerical Model and Experiments for a Direct Current Plasma Flow

被引:0
|
作者
S. M. Aithal
V. V. Subramaniam
V. Babu
机构
[1] The Ohio State University,Center for Advanced Plasma Engineering, Non
[2] Ford Motor Company,Equilibrium Thermodynamics Laboratories, Department of Mechanical Engineering
[3] Indian Institute of Technology,Scientific Research Laboratory
来源
关键词
Hydrogen plasma; arcjets; simulation; LBI method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The governing equations describing a flowing stream of a hydrogen plasma encountered in applications, such as diamond deposition, and in devices, such as arcjet thrusters, are solved numerically using the linearized implicit (LBI) Method of Briley and McDonald. The results of simulations under the assumption that the plasma can be described by a single temperature are compared with detailed experimental measurements of flow characteristics and species concentrations in a 1 kW arcjet. These comparisons show that by formulating the problem in terms of known experimental operating conditions, such as mass flow rate, power, and current levels, it is possible to predict many of the characteristics of the flowing plasma. As expected, predictions from this one-temperature model show that some deviations from the experimental results occur near the exit plane of the channel, where unequal electron and heavy particle temperatures are encountered because of lower pressures.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 504
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparisons between numerical model and experiments for a direct current plasma flow
    Aithal, SM
    Subramaniam, VV
    Babu, V
    [J]. PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 1999, 19 (04) : 487 - 504
  • [2] Numerical study of supersonic direct current plasma nozzle flow
    Jodoin, B
    Proulx, P
    Mercadier, Y
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (04) : 578 - 584
  • [3] NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS WITH A PLASMA MODEL
    ELDRIDGE, OC
    FEIX, M
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1963, 6 (03) : 398 - 406
  • [4] Flow through porous fences in thick boundary layers: comparisons between laboratory and numerical experiments
    Packwood, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2000, 88 (01) : 75 - 90
  • [5] Comparison between experiments and direct numerical simulations in a channel flow with roughness on one wall
    Burattini, P.
    Leonardi, S.
    Orlandi, P.
    Antonia, R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2008, 600 : 403 - 426
  • [6] Numerical experiments on plasma focus pinch current limitation
    Lee, S.
    Lee, P.
    Saw, S. H.
    Rawat, R. S.
    [J]. PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2008, 50 (06)
  • [7] COMPARISONS BETWEEN PHYSICAL MODEL AND NUMERICAL-MODEL RESULTS
    SAGASTA, PF
    [J]. AAPG BULLETIN-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1986, 70 (04): : 478 - 478
  • [8] Comparisons of purely topological model, betweenness based model and direct current power flow model to analyze power grid vulnerability
    Ouyang, Min
    [J]. CHAOS, 2013, 23 (02)
  • [9] Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: Comparisons between models and experiments
    Blocken, B.
    Stathopoulos, T.
    Saathoff, P.
    Wang, X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) : 1817 - 1831
  • [10] A comparison between experiments and numerical simulations on a scale model of a Horizontal-Axis current turbine
    Lazzerini, Guido
    Coiro, Domenico P.
    Troise, Giancarlo
    D'Amato, Giuseppe
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 190 : 919 - 934