Multi-fidelity design optimisation strategy under uncertainty with limited computational budget

被引:0
|
作者
Péter Zénó Korondi
Mariapia Marchi
Lucia Parussini
Carlo Poloni
机构
[1] University of Trieste,Department of Engineering and Architecture
[2] ESTECO S.p.A,undefined
来源
关键词
Multi-fidelity learning; Gaussian process regression; Co-Kriging; Design optimisation under uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this work, a design optimisation strategy is presented for expensive and uncertain single- and multi-objective problems. Computationally expensive design fitness evaluations prohibit the application of standard optimisation techniques and the direct calculation of risk measures. Therefore, a surrogate-assisted optimisation framework is presented. The computational budget limits the number of high-fidelity simulations which makes impossible to accurately approximate the landscape. This motivates the use of cheap low-fidelity simulations to obtain more information about the unexplored locations of the design space. The information stemming from numerical experiments of various fidelities can be fused together with multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression to build an accurate surrogate model despite the low number of high-fidelity simulations. We propose a new strategy for automatically selecting the fidelity level of the surrogate model update. The proposed method is extended to multi-objective applications. Although, Gaussian processes can inherently model uncertain processes, here the deterministic input and uncertain parameters are treated separately and only the design space is modelled with a Gaussian process. The probabilistic space is modelled with a polynomial chaos expansion to allow also uncertainties of non-Gaussian type. The combination of the above techniques allows us to efficiently carry out a (multi-objective) design optimisation under uncertainty which otherwise would be impractical.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1064
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-fidelity design optimisation strategy under uncertainty with limited computational budget
    Korondi, Peter Zeno
    Marchi, Mariapia
    Parussini, Lucia
    Poloni, Carlo
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 22 (02) : 1039 - 1064
  • [2] Multi-Fidelity Design Optimization under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Hou, Liqiang
    Tan, Wei
    Ma, Hong
    2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 4452 - 4459
  • [3] Multi-fidelity robust aerodynamic design optimization under mixed uncertainty
    Shah, Harsheel
    Hosder, Serhat
    Koziel, Slawomir
    Tesfahunegn, Yonatan A.
    Leifsson, Leifur
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 45 : 17 - 29
  • [4] MULTI-FIDELITY DESIGN OPTIMISATION OF A TRANSONIC COMPRESSOR ROTOR
    Brooks, C. J.
    Forrester, A. I. J.
    Keane, A. J.
    Shahpar, S.
    9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON TURBOMACHINERY: FLUID DYNAMICS AND THERMODYNAMICS, VOLS I AND II, 2011, : 1267 - 1276
  • [5] Development of a multi-fidelity optimisation strategy based on hybrid methods
    Ko, Agusti Porta
    Horcas, Sergio Gonzalez
    Pons-Prats, Jordi
    Bugeda, Gabriel
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2024, 67 (09)
  • [6] Multi-Task Learning for Design Under Uncertainty With Multi-Fidelity Partially Observed Information
    Xu, Yanwen
    Wu, Hao
    Liu, Zheng
    Wang, Pingfeng
    Li, Yumeng
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2024, 146 (08)
  • [7] A multi-fidelity polynomial chaos-greedy Kaczmarz approach for resource-efficient uncertainty quantification on limited budget
    Alemazkoor, Negin
    Louhghalam, Arghavan
    Tootkaboni, Mazdak
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 389
  • [8] Multi-Fidelity Design Optimisation of a Solenoid-Driven Linear Compressor
    Beckers, Jarl
    Coppitters, Diederik
    De Paepe, Ward
    Contino, Francesco
    Van Mierlo, Joeri
    Verrelst, Bjorn
    ACTUATORS, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [9] Multi-fidelity orbit uncertainty propagation
    Jones, Brandon A.
    Weisman, Ryan
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2019, 155 : 406 - 417
  • [10] Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimisation with Continuous Approximations
    Kandasamy, Kirthevasan
    Dasarathy, Gautam
    Schneider, Jeff
    Poczos, Barnabas
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 70, 2017, 70