Speech Rate Modification and Its Effects on Fluency Reversal in Fluent Speakers and People Who Stutter

被引:0
|
作者
Peter Howell
Stevie Sackin
机构
[1] University College London,
[2] University College London,undefined
关键词
stuttering; speech rate; modification; fluency reversal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A theory has been proposed recently that asserts that the problem that people who stutter have arises when these speakers attempt to execute speech at a faster rate than planning processes allow. This leads speakers to complete words before the following one is ready. Plan unavailability usually happens on the more complex content words rather than the relatively simple function words. There are two ways of dealing with this situation when it arises. Speakers can (1) delay production of a content word by repeating prior function words or (2) carry on and attempt to produce the following content word and gamble that the remainder of the plan arrives while it is being executed. The former strategy does not lead speakers to persist in their dysfluency, while the latter does. It is proposed that the pressure on speech rate that leads speakers to adopt the latter strategy is particularly acute around adolescence. In this article two experiments are reported which test the effects of rate on fluency. In Experiment 1, fluent speakers are induced to produce stuttering-like dysfluencies on content words using a commentary task. A prediction of the theory is that procedures known to induce fluency have to produce local slowing of speech so that planning and execution can get back in synchrony. This prediction is confirmed for frequency-shifted feedback and when speakers who stutter have to sing in Experiment 2. Results are discussed in terms of the model for the etiology of stuttering based on plan unavailability. The implications of the results are also discussed with respect to the diagnosis of the disorder and how it can be treated.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 315
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Speech rate modification and its effects on fluency reversal in fluent speakers and people who stutter
    Howell, P
    Sackin, S
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2000, 12 (04) : 291 - 315
  • [2] The effects of gated speech on the fluency of speakers who stutter
    Howell, Peter
    FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2007, 59 (05) : 250 - 255
  • [3] Anticipatory coarticulation and stability of speech in typically fluent speakers and people who stutter
    Frisch, Stefan A.
    Maxfield, Nathan
    Belmont, Alissa
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2016, 30 (3-5) : 277 - 291
  • [4] Planning and execution processes in speech control by fluent speakers and speakers who stutter
    Howell, P
    Dworzynski, K
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2005, 30 (04) : 343 - 354
  • [5] Speech dynamics are coded in the left motor cortex in fluent speakers but not in adults who stutter
    Neef, Nicole E.
    Hoang, T. N. Linh
    Neef, Andreas
    Paulus, Walter
    Sommer, Martin
    BRAIN, 2015, 138 : 712 - 725
  • [6] How fluent is the fluent speech of people who stutter? A new approach to measuring kinematics with ultrasound
    Heyde, Cornelia J.
    Scobbie, James M.
    Lickley, Robin
    Drake, Eleanor K. E.
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2016, 30 (3-5) : 292 - 312
  • [7] Formant transitions in the fluent speech of Farsi-speaking people who stutter
    Dehqan, Ali
    Yadegari, Fariba
    Blomgren, Michael
    Scherer, Ronald C.
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2016, 48 : 1 - 15
  • [8] Speech skill learning of persons who stutter and fluent speakers under single and dual task conditions
    Smits-Bandstra, Sarah
    De Nil, Luc
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2009, 23 (01) : 38 - 57
  • [9] CONSTANCY OF INTERSTRESS INTERVALS IN THE FLUENT SPEECH OF PEOPLE WHO STUTTER DURING ADAPTATION TRIALS
    PRINS, D
    HUBBARD, CP
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 35 (04): : 799 - 804
  • [10] Orofacial movements associated with fluent speech in persons who stutter
    McClean, MD
    Tasko, SM
    Runyan, CM
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2004, 47 (02): : 294 - 303