Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PRP) with standard transurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate (TURP). A total of 240 patients (mean age 63.5; age range 52–90 years), with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized into two groups and treated with two different techniques (TURP and PRP). We evaluated pre-operative, per-operative and post-operative (first and 12th months) findings of all patients. The mean catheterization time was 3 and 4.5 days in the PRP and standard TURP groups, respectively (P<0.001). We observed the improvements in maximum flow rates in PRP group were significantly higher than TURP group (P<0.001). TUR of the prostate using plasmakinetic energy seems to be a promising treatment alternative to conventional TURP. It has the advantages of low intraoperative and post-operative complications, short convalescence, excellent intraoperative hemostasis, absence of fluid absorption and TUR syndrome.