Are industry-funded charities promoting “advocacy-led studies” or “evidence-based science”?: a case study of the International Life Sciences Institute

被引：0
|
作者：
Sarah Steele
Gary Ruskin
Lejla Sarcevic
Martin McKee
David Stuckler
机构：
[1] University of Cambridge,Department of Politics and International Studies
[2] Jesus College,Dondena Research Centre and Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management
[3] U.S. Right to Know,undefined
[4] Department of Public Health and Policy,undefined
[5] London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine,undefined
[6] University of Bocconi,undefined
来源：
Globalization and Health | / 15卷
关键词：
International Life Sciences Institute; Industry funding; Lobbying; Advocacy; Conflicts of interest;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Are industry-funded charities promoting "advocacy-led studies" or "evidence-based science"?: a case study of the International Life Sciences Institute
    Steele, Sarah
    Ruskin, Gary
    Sarcevic, Lejla
    McKee, Martin
    Stuckler, David
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2019, 15 (1)
  • [2] Correction to: Are industry-funded charities promoting “advocacy-led studies” or “evidence-based science”?: a case study of the International Life Sciences Institute
    Sarah Steele
    Gary Ruskin
    Lejla Sarcevic
    Martin McKee
    David Stuckler
    Globalization and Health, 15
  • [3] Are industry-funded charities promoting "advocacy-led studies" or "evidence-based science"?: a case study of the International Life Sciences Institute (vol 15, 36, 2019)
    Steele, Sarah
    Ruskin, Gary
    Sarcevic, Lejla
    McKee, Martin
    Stuckler, David
    GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2019, 15 (01)
1