Comparative Finite Element Analysis of the Debonding Process in Different Concepts of Cemented Hip Implants

被引:0
|
作者
M. A. Pérez
J. Palacios
机构
[1] University of Zaragoza,Group of Structural Mechanics and Materials Modelling, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A)
[2] Aragón Institute of Health Sciences,CIBER
[3] University of Zaragoza,BBN, Centre on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine
来源
关键词
Cemented hip implants; Interdigitated bone; Bone–cement interface; Cement mantle; Degradation; Finite element analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Damage accumulation in the cement mantle and debonding of the bone–cement interface are basic events that contribute to the long-term failure of cemented hip reconstructions. In this work, a numerical study with these two process coupled is presented. Previously uniform bone–cement interface mechanical properties were only considered. In this work, a new approach assuming nonuniform and random bone–cement interface mechanical properties was applied to investigate its effect on cement degradation. This methodology was also applied to simulate and compare the degradation process of the cement and bone–cement interface in three different concepts of design: Exeter, Charnley, and ABG II stems. Nonuniform and random mechanical properties of the bone–cement interface implied a simulation closer to reality. The predicted results showed that the cement deterioration and bone–cement interface debonding is different for each implant depending on the stem geometry. Lower cement deterioration was obtained for the Charnley stem and lower bone–cement interface debonding was predicted for the Exeter stem, while the highest deterioration (cement and bone–cement interface) was produced for the ABG II stem.
引用
收藏
页码:2093 / 2106
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Finite Element Analysis of the Debonding Process in Different Concepts of Cemented Hip Implants
    Perez, M. A.
    Palacios, J.
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 38 (06) : 2093 - 2106
  • [2] A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants
    Perez, M. A.
    Garcia-Aznar, J. M.
    Doblare, M.
    Seral, B.
    Seral, F.
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2006, 28 (06) : 525 - 533
  • [3] Patient-specific finite element analysis of femurs with cemented hip implants
    Katz, Yekutiel
    Lubovsky, Omri
    Yosibash, Zohar
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 58 : 74 - 89
  • [4] Finite element analysis of the mechanical behaviour of the different cemented hip femoral prostheses
    Bouziane, M. M.
    Benbarek, S.
    Tabeti, S. M. H.
    Bouiadjra, B. Bachir
    Serier, B.
    Achour, T.
    ADVANCES IN FRACTURE AND DAMAGE MECHANICS XII, 2014, 577-578 : 349 - +
  • [5] Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants
    Stolk, Jan
    Janssen, Dennis
    Huiskes, Rik
    Verdonschot, Nico
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (456) : 138 - 147
  • [6] Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants?
    Stolk, J
    Maher, SA
    Verdonschot, N
    Prendergast, PJ
    Huiskes, R
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (409) : 138 - 150
  • [7] Finite element modelling and analysis of a new cemented hip prosthesis
    Kayabasi, Oguz
    Erzincanli, Fehmi
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2006, 37 (07) : 477 - 483
  • [8] Effects of prosthesis surface roughness on the failure process of cemented hip implants after stem-cement debonding
    Verdonschot, N
    Tanck, E
    Huiskes, R
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1998, 42 (04): : 554 - 559
  • [9] Finite Element Analysis of Cemented Hip Arthroplasty: Influence of Stem Tapers
    Abdullah, Abdul H.
    Asri, Mohd N. Mohd
    Alias, Mohd S.
    Giha, Tardan
    INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS (IMECS 2010), VOLS I-III, 2010, : 2241 - +
  • [10] Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Short Implants with Different Treatment Approaches in the Atrophic Mandible
    Doganay, Ozge
    Kilic, Erdem
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (04) : E69 - E76