Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion

被引:1
|
作者
Matthew Heath
Christina Rival
Gordon Binsted
机构
[1] Indiana University,Department of Kinesiology and Program in Neural Science
[2] Indiana University,Department of Psychology
[3] University of Saskatchewan,College of Kinesiology
来源
关键词
Grasping; Closed-loop; Open-loop; Perception; Action;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of the present investigation was to determine the time-course by which the motor system might resolve the context-dependent effects of a visual illusion [i.e., the Müller-Lyer (ML) figure]. Specifically, we asked participants to scale their grip aperture (GA) to the perceived size of an object embedded within a ML figure in advance of closed-loop (CL) and open-loop (OL) grasping movements. As a result, premovement GA was biased in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the illusion. We reasoned that such a manipulation might provide a novel opportunity to determine whether the motor system is able to resolve a biased GA immediately following the onset of a response [i.e., in accord with the perception/action model (PAM); Milner and Goodale 1995, The visual brain in action, Oxford University Press], or gradually as the action unfolds [i.e., in accord with the planning/control model (PCM); Glover and Dixon 2002, Percept Psychophys 64:266–278]. It was found that biasing GA in advance of movement resulted in a reliable effect of the ML figure throughout CL and OL trials (i.e., up to 80% of grasping time). Although the present findings appear contrary to the theoretical tenets of the PAM and the PCM, it is proposed that biasing GA in advance of movement leads to offline visual processing and a feedforward mode of grasping control, thus accounting for the illusion-induced effect throughout the grasping response.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 384
页数:6
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Muller-Lyer illusion
    Heath, M
    Rival, C
    Binsted, G
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 158 (03) : 378 - 384
  • [2] Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?
    Cheryl M. Glazebrook
    Victoria P. Dhillon
    Katherine M. Keetch
    James Lyons
    Eric Amazeen
    Daniel J. Weeks
    Digby Elliott
    Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 160 : 71 - 78
  • [3] Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements
    Matthew Heath
    Christina Rival
    Kristina Neely
    Olav Krigolson
    Experimental Brain Research, 2006, 169 : 473 - 481
  • [4] Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information
    John Predebon
    Experimental Brain Research, 2005, 163 : 100 - 108
  • [5] Can you believe your eyes? Positive schizotypy is associated with increased susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer illusion
    Lanyi, Orsolya
    Keri, Szabolcs
    Palffy, Zsofia
    Polner, Bertalan
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2024, 264 : 327 - 335
  • [6] Left, right, left, right, eyes to the front! Müller-Lyer bias in grasping is not a function of hand used, hand preferred or visual hemifield, but foveation does matter
    John van der Kamp
    Matthieu M. de Wit
    Rich S. W. Masters
    Experimental Brain Research, 2012, 218 : 91 - 98