Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer; [Toxizität und Risikofaktoren nach kombinierter Hochdosis-Brachytherapie und perkutaner Bestrahlung bei Männern ≥75 Jahren mit lokalisiertem Prostatakarzinom]

被引:0
|
作者
Löser A. [1 ]
Beyer B. [2 ]
Carl C.O. [1 ]
Löser B. [3 ]
Nagaraj Y. [2 ]
Frenzel T. [1 ]
Petersen C. [4 ]
Krüll A. [1 ]
Graefen M. [2 ]
Schwarz R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Outpatient Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg
[2] Martini-Klinik, Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg
[3] Department of Anaesthesiology, Center of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Schillingallee 35, Rostock
[4] Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg
关键词
Biochemical recurrence; Brachytherapy; External beam radiotherapy; Old patients; Prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-018-1380-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a favorable treatment option in non-metastatic prostate cancer. However, reports on toxicity and outcome have mainly focused on younger patients. We aimed to determine toxicity and biochemical control rates after combined HDR-BT and EBRT in men ≥75 years. Methods: From 1999 to 2015, 134 patients aged ≥75 years (median 76 years; 75–82 years) were identified. Patients received 18 Gy of HDR-BT (9 Gy/fraction on days 1 and 8) with an iridium-192 source. After 1 week, supplemental EBRT with a target dose of 50.4 Gy was started (delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions). Results: Median follow-up time was 25 months (0–127 months). No severe (grade 4) gastrointestinal (GIT) or genitourinary (GUT) toxicities were observed. In 76 patients (56.7%), 3D conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and in 34.3% intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was applied. CRT-treated patients were at a 2.17-times higher risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31–3.57, p = 0.002) of experiencing GUT. GIT risks could be reduced by 78% using IMRT (HR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07–0.75, p = 0.015). Patients with a higher T stage (T2c–3a/b) were less likely to experience GIT or GUT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29–0.85, p = 0.011 and HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3–0.81, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusion: HDR-BT/EBRT is a well-tolerated treatment option for elderly men ≥75 years with a limited number of comorbidities and localized intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. IMRT should be favored since side effects were significantly reduced in IMRT-treated patients. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 382
页数:8
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Toxicity and risk factors after combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy in men ≥75 years with localized prostate cancer
    Loeser, Anastassia
    Beyer, Burkhard
    Carl, Cedric Oliver
    Loeser, Benjamin
    Nagaraj, Yamini
    Frenzel, Thorsten
    Petersen, Cordula
    Kruell, Andreas
    Graefen, Markus
    Schwarz, Rudolf
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 (05) : 374 - 382
  • [2] Focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: toxicity and preliminary biochemical results; [Fokale Brachytherapie mit hoher Dosisrate beim lokalisierten Prostatakarzinom: Toxizität und vorläufige biochemische Ergebnisse]
    Prada P.J.
    Cardenal J.
    García Blanco A.
    Andreescu J.
    Ferri M.
    Anchuelo J.
    Diaz de Cerio I.
    Sierrasesumaga N.
    Vázquez A.
    Pacheco M.
    Ruiz Arrebola S.
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2020, 196 (3) : 222 - 228