Comparative susceptibility of chickens, turkeys and ducks to infectious bursal disease virus using immunohistochemistry

被引:0
|
作者
O. A. Oladele
D. F. Adene
T. U. Obi
H. O. Nottidge
机构
[1] University of Ibadan,Department of Veterinary Medicine
来源
关键词
Infectious bursal disease; Differential susceptibility; Immunohistochemistry; Chicken; Turkey; Duck;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Twenty chicks, 12 turkey poults and 10 ducklings, all 5 weeks old were infected with 2 × 103.5 chick LD50 IBD virus to determine the course of the virus in the 3 poultry species. Uninfected control birds were kept separately. Two infected and 2 control birds/species were euthanized at time intervals between 3 and 168 hours post infection (pi). Sections of thymus, bursa of Fabricius, spleen, liver, kidney, proventriculus and ceacal tonsil were stained for the detection of IBD virus antigen using immunoperoxidase technique. IBD virus antigen positive cells stained reddish-brown and the amount of such cells in tissue sections were noted and scored. Stained cells were present in all organs examined for up to 168 hours pi in the 3 poultry species except ceacal tonsils of ducks at 72 and 120 hours pi. Antigen score was highest in chickens and least in ducks as reflected by average of total scores/sampling time of 12, 10.8 and 8 in chickens, turkeys and ducks respectively. Total antigen score/sampling time in infected chickens peaked twice; 24/48 and 144 hours pi, whereas such bi-phasic peaks were absent in turkeys and ducks. Range of total antigen score at different sampling times was 7–17.5 in chickens, 10–13 in turkeys and 7–10 in ducks indicative of marked viral replication in chickens. Presence of IBD viral antigen in organs of all 3 poultry species is indicative of infections. The innate ability of turkeys and ducks to prevent appreciable replication of IBD virus after infection requires further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative susceptibility of chickens, turkeys and ducks to infectious bursal disease virus using immunohistochemistry
    Oladele, O. A.
    Adene, D. F.
    Obi, T. U.
    Nottidge, H. O.
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 33 (02) : 111 - 121
  • [2] Comparative pathogenicity of different strains of infectious bursal disease, virus in chickens
    Singh, KCP
    Dhawedkar, RG
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1997, 74 (02): : 104 - 107
  • [3] Influence of the structural development of bursa on the susceptibility of chickens to infectious bursal disease virus
    Zhao, Sufen
    Jia, Yuanyuan
    Han, Deping
    Ma, Haiyan
    Shah, Syed Zahid Ali
    Ma, Yunfei
    Teng, Kedao
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2016, 95 (12) : 2786 - 2794
  • [4] ISOLATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS FROM TURKEYS
    MCNULTY, MS
    ALLAN, GM
    MCFERRAN, JB
    AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1979, 8 (03) : 205 - &
  • [5] Pathogenicity of Genome Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Viruses in Chickens and Turkeys
    Jackwood, Daral J.
    Stoute, Simone T.
    Crossley, Beate M.
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2016, 60 (04) : 765 - 772
  • [6] Comparative study of the resistance or susceptibility of local Nigerian and exotic chickens to infectious bursal disease
    Okoye, JOA
    Aba-Adulugba, EP
    AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1998, 27 (02) : 168 - 173
  • [7] Susceptibility of vaccinated and unvaccinated Egyptian chickens to very virulent infectious bursal disease virus
    Hassan, MK
    Afify, M
    Aly, MM
    AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2002, 31 (02) : 149 - 156
  • [8] Infectious bursal disease virus of chickens: pathogenesis and immunosuppression
    Sharma, JM
    Kim, IJ
    Rautenschlein, S
    Yeh, HY
    DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 24 (2-3): : 223 - 235
  • [9] THE ISOLATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS FROM TURKEYS IN ENGLAND
    CHETTLE, NJ
    EDDY, RK
    WYETH, PJ
    BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1985, 141 (02): : 141 - 145
  • [10] IMMUNODEPRESSIVE EFFECT OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS IN CHICKENS
    HIRAI, K
    SHIMAKURA, S
    KAWAMOTO, E
    TAGUCHI, F
    KIM, ST
    CHANG, CN
    IRITANI, Y
    AVIAN DISEASES, 1974, 18 (01) : 50 - 57